Aberra v. City of New York

Filing 94

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's "Notice of Motion" dated December 22, 2020. (ECF No. 93). Because the relief requested therein is not ripe for the Court's consideration, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed close the Motion at ECF No. 93 and to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at the below address. So ordered. Denying without prejudice 93 MOTION to permit the plaintiff to pre sent his video evidence and 911 recording; and that the video be fully vetted for comparison and contrast, subject to the Court's judgment along with the 911 call. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 12/23/2020) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Mail To: Natanya Aberra, 2075 3rd Ave., Apt. 6-C, New York, NY 10029.

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-01138-LAK-SLC Document 94 Filed 12/23/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NATANYA ABERRA, Plaintiff, -v- CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18 Civ. 1138 (LAK) (SLC) CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s “Notice of Motion” dated December 22, 2020. (ECF No. 93). Because the relief requested therein is not ripe for the Court’s consideration, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed close the Motion at ECF No. 93 and to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at the below address. Dated: New York, New York December 23, 2020 SO ORDERED Mail To: Natanya Aberra 2075 3rd Ave., Apt. 6-C New York, NY 10029

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?