Charles v. Seinfeld et al

Filing 120

ORDER denying 109 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 117 Letter Motion to Stay. After reviewing the parties' submissions, the Court denies Defendants' fees motion without prejudice. According to the 1993 Advisory Committee Notes to Fe deral Rule of Civil Procedure 54, "[i]f an appeal on the merits of the case is taken, the court may rule on the claim for fees, may defer its ruling on the motion, or may deny the motion without prejudice, directing under subdivision (d)(2)(B) a new period for filing after the appeal has been resolved." While the Court recognizes that piecemeal appeals are generally undesirable, the expedited briefing schedule set by the Second Circuit would not leave Charles' counsel enough time to brief the fees issue in the event that the Court granted Defendants' motion. And while Charles has only asked for briefing on the fees motion to be stayed, the Court believes that the content of a fees motion may be altered depending on the o utcome and reasoning of the Second Circuit's opinion. If this Court is affirmed, then Defendants' renewed fees motion shall be due 14 days after the issuance of the Second Circuit's mandate. This resolves Dkt. Nos. 109, 117. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/20/2019) (kv)

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?