Moses et al v. Griffin Industries, LLC et al
Filing
108
ORDER denying as moot 91 Motion for Entry of Default. On June 24, 2019, Defendants Griffin Industries, Griffin Security Services, Michael Smith, Winston Smith, Andrew Muniz, Aaron Muniz, Dane Yee, Mario Lopez, and Sexton Alston ("G riffin Defendants") were granted an extension of time until July 10, 2019 to file an Answer, with Plaintiffs' consent. (ECF 96). The Griffin Defendants subsequently filed their Answer on July 10, 2019. (ECF 100). Defendants Grant Assoc iates, Nique Irving, and Workforce 1 were dismissed from this action by Plaintiffs. (ECF 98). Accordingly, any request for a default is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close ECF 91. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 12/10/2019) (mro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------x
RAVEN MOSES, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
-against:
:
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW
:
YORK, INC., et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
-------------------------------------------------------------x
18-CV-1200 (ALC) (OTW)
ORDER
ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:
On June 24, 2019, Defendants Griffin Industries, Griffin Security Services, Michael Smith,
Winston Smith, Andrew Muniz, Aaron Muniz, Dane Yee, Mario Lopez, and Sexton Alston
(“Griffin Defendants”) were granted an extension of time until July 10, 2019 to file an Answer,
with Plaintiffs’ consent. (ECF 96). The Griffin Defendants subsequently filed their Answer on July
10, 2019. (ECF 100). Defendants Grant Associates, Nique Irving, and Workforce 1 were
dismissed from this action by Plaintiffs. (ECF 98). Accordingly, any request for a default is
DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close ECF 91.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 10, 2019
New York, New York
s/ Ona T. Wang
Ona T. Wang
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?