Moses et al v. Griffin Industries, LLC et al

Filing 675

ORDER granting 674 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. The status conference scheduled for March 9, 2023 is adjourned. The proposed briefing schedule for Con Edison's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The joint proposed discovery schedule is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF 674. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 3/8/2023) (jca)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-01200-ALC-OTW Document 675 Filed 03/08/23 Page 1 of 2 Providing Exemplary Legal Service Since 1888 KATE MCGUIRE DIRECT DIAL: 212-545-4773 FACSIMILE: 212-545-4653 mcguire@whafh.com 270 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10016 212-545-4600 SYMPHONY TOWERS 750 B STREET - SUITE 2770 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 619-239-4599 WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLC 70 W. MADISON ST., STE, 1400 CHICAGO, IL 60602 312-984-0000 March 7, 2023 VIA ECF Hon. Ona T. Wang United States Magistrate Judge Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 20D New York, New York 10007 Re: MEMO ENDORSED. Moses, et al. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., et al., No. 18-cv-1200-ALC-OTW Dear Judge Wang: We represent Plaintiffs in the above captioned matter and write, with the agreement of Defendants, to respectfully request adjournment of the upcoming status conference that is set for Thursday, March 9, 2023. We request this adjournment because the parties are currently making good progress with respect to a schedule for the remaining discovery in this case, and also because Judge Carter has not yet issued his decision on the class certification motion in this action. The parties have continued their communications concerning proposed deadlines, and modified the schedule slightly from deadlines previously discussed in filings with the Court. E.g., ECF 669. First, Con Edison requests the following schedule for briefing of its up-coming summary judgment motion on joint employer status: • Con Edison to file its motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ joint employer claims on or before May 1, 2023; • Plaintiffs to file their opposition on or before June 1, 2023; and • Con Edison to file its reply on or before June 22, 2023. Case 1:18-cv-01200-ALC-OTW Document 675 Filed 03/08/23 Page 2 of 2 Plaintiffs do not oppose the above schedule, and the remaining Griffin Defendants similarly have no objection. Plaintiffs and Con Edison have also agreed to the following discovery schedule, to which the remaining Griffin Defendants make no objection: • Initial Document Requests and Interrogatories concerning Prevailing Wage Claims (and any other written discovery requests) have now been served on and before February 20, 2023 (subsequent requests and interrogatories may be served in the event that materials produced in response to such written discovery requests reveal the need for further requests); • Responses and objections to initial document requests and interrogatories (and any other written discovery requests) shall be served within 30 calendar days of the above described written discovery requests; • Depositions of 30(b)(6) witness shall be completed on or before April 28, 2023; • Expert witnesses to be identified on or before April 24, 2023; • Depositions of Expert witnesses and expert discovery to be completed on or before August 31, 2023 • Fact discovery to be completed on or before August 1, 2023. We thank the Court for its consideration in this matter. Application GRANTED. The status conference scheduled for March 9, 2023 is adjourned. The proposed briefing schedule for Con Edison's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The joint proposed discovery schedule is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF 674. SO ORDERED. ________________________ U.S.M.J. Ona T. Wang 3/8/23 Sincerely, /s/ Kate McGuire Kate McGuire

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?