Tarzy v. Dwyer et al

Filing 67

ORDER: Accordingly, the Court AMENDS its August 5, 2020 scheduling order as follows: 1. By September 9, 2020, Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment, not to exceed 30 pages; 2. By October 7, 2020, Plaintiff shall file his cross-mot ion for summary judgment, and any opposition to Defendants' motion, in a single memorandum of law not to exceed 40 pages; 3. By October 28, 2020, Defendants shall file their opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment an d any reply in support of their own motion for summary judgment, in a single memorandum of law not to exceed 40 pages; and 4. By November 18, 2020, Plaintiff shall file his reply, if any, not to exceed 15 pages. The parties are to rely on the R ule 56.1 statements, and evidence cited therein, already submitted in support of their requests for leave to file summary judgment. The parties should make any request for sealing or filing in redacted form when submitting their motion papers and shall do so in accordance with the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, Rule IV.A.ii. In accordance with the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, Rule III.C.V, the parties should either email to chambers a text-searchable courtesy copy of any deposition transcripts, or mail such copies directly to chambers on a CD. See Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19, Rule 1.B. Such transcripts need not be filed on the public docket. SO ORDERED. (Cross Motions due by 10/7/2020, Motions due by 9/9/2020, Responses due by 10/28/2020, Replies due by 11/18/2020.) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/7/2020) (jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALAN A. TARZY, ESQ., USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 8/7/2020 Plaintiff, -against18 Civ. 1456 (AT) ANDREW DWYER and DWYER & BARRETT, L.L.C. formerly known as THE DWYER LAW FIRM, L.L.C., ORDER Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: On August 5, 2020, this Court set a briefing schedule for the parties’ filing of summary judgment motions. ECF No. 65. Later that day, Defendants wrote to the Court seeking clarification on the scheduling order. ECF No. 66. Accordingly, the Court AMENDS its August 5, 2020 scheduling order as follows: 1. By September 9, 2020, Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment, not to exceed 30 pages; 2. By October 7, 2020, Plaintiff shall file his cross-motion for summary judgment, and any opposition to Defendants’ motion, in a single memorandum of law not to exceed 40 pages; 3. By October 28, 2020, Defendants shall file their opposition to Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment and any reply in support of their own motion for summary judgment, in a single memorandum of law not to exceed 40 pages; and 4. By November 18, 2020, Plaintiff shall file his reply, if any, not to exceed 15 pages. The parties are to rely on the Rule 56.1 statements, and evidence cited therein, already submitted in support of their requests for leave to file summary judgment. The parties should make any request for sealing or filing in redacted form when submitting their motion papers and shall do so in accordance with the Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, Rule IV.A.ii. In accordance with the Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, Rule III.C.V, the parties should either email to chambers a text-searchable courtesy copy of any deposition transcripts, or mail such copies directly to chambers on a CD. See Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19, Rule 1.B. Such transcripts need not be filed on the public docket. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 7, 2020 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?