Elleby v. Doe(s) et al

Filing 49

ORDER for 48 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation, dismissing the second amended complaint because all claims asserted therein are barred by the statute of limitations. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se and to close the case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/21/2019) (cf) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
TAYE L. ELLEBY,

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 2/21/2019

Plaintiff,
-againstJANE & JOHN DOE(S) ET AL.,

18 Civ. 1577 (AT) (SDA)
ORDER

Defendants.
ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:
Having received no objection to the Honorable Stewart D. Aaron’s February 4, 2019
report and recommendation, ECF No. 48, the Court reviewed the recommendation and found no
clear error. See Silva v. Peninsula Hotel, 509 F. Supp. 2d 364, 366 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (“If no
objections are filed . . . reviewing courts should review a report and recommendation for clear
error.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). Accordingly, the Court accepts and
adopts the thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation, dismissing the second
amended complaint because all claims asserted therein are barred by the statute of limitations.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se and to
close the case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 21, 2019
New York, New York