Michelo et al v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2 et al

Filing 147

ORDER: Oppositions and replies to plaintiffs' letter-motion shall be filed in accordance with the Court's Individual Practices. See Moses Indiv. Prac. §§ 1(b)-(d), 2(e); Moses Emergency Indiv. Prac. §§ 1(a), (d). The parties should be prepared to address the discovery disputes raised in plaintiffs' May 1 letter-motion during the telephonic conference previously scheduled for May 12, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. (see Dkt. No. 145 in Case No. 18-CV-1781; Dkt. No. 88 in Case No. 18-CV-7692) to consider the Trust Defendants' pending letter-motion to compel discovery from plaintiff (Dkt. No. 140 in Case No. 18-CV-1781; Dkt. No. 83 in Case No. 18-CV-7692). It is the Court's intention to decide the disp utes raised in both letter-motions at the May 12 conference, based on the parties' letters and on any argument presented during the conference, unless a party shows good cause why more formal briefing should be required. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 5/4/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-01781-PGG-BCM, 1:18-cv-07692-PGG-BCM (cf)

Case 1:18-cv-01781-PGG-BCM Document 147 Filed 05/04/20 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MUTINTA MICHELO, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, et al.,

5/4/20
18-CV-1781 (PGG) (BCM)

Plaintiffs,
-againstNATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT
LOAN TRUST 2007-2, et al.,
Defendants.
CHRISTINA BIFULCO, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

18-cv-7692 (PGG) (BCM)
ORDER

-againstNATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT
LOAN TRUST 2007-2, et al.,
Defendants.
BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court has received and reviewed plaintiffs' letter-motion dated May 1, 2020 (Dkt.
No. 146 in Case No. 18-CV-1781; Dkt. No. 89 in Case No. 18-CV-7692), which raises three
discovery disputes, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 37.2, with the Trust Defendants and the
Transworld Defendants.
Oppositions and replies to plaintiffs' letter-motion shall be filed in accordance with the
Court's Individual Practices. See Moses Indiv. Prac. §§ 1(b)-(d), 2(e); Moses Emergency Indiv.
Prac. §§ 1(a), (d). The parties should be prepared to address the discovery disputes raised in
plaintiffs' May 1 letter-motion during the telephonic conference previously scheduled for May
12, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. (see Dkt. No. 145 in Case No. 18-CV-1781; Dkt. No. 88 in Case No. 18CV-7692) to consider the Trust Defendants' pending letter-motion to compel discovery from
plaintiff (Dkt. No. 140 in Case No. 18-CV-1781; Dkt. No. 83 in Case No. 18-CV-7692). It is the

Case 1:18-cv-01781-PGG-BCM Document 147 Filed 05/04/20 Page 2 of 2

Court's intention to decide the disputes raised in both letter-motions at the May 12 conference,
based on the parties' letters and on any argument presented during the conference, unless a party
shows good cause why more formal briefing should be required.
Dated: New York, New York
May 4, 2020

SO ORDERED.

________________________________
BARBARA MOSES
United States Magistrate Judge

2