Vasquez et al. v. Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Ltd. et al.

Filing 142

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 141 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Ltd., against Eva Garcia, Rigoberto Vasquez. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 10, 2020, the claims against HSBC Hong Kong are dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2). Given this dismissal, the Court does not consider the arguments made by HSBC Hong Kong in its earlier- filed Rule 12(b)(6) motion; accordingly, this case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 8/10/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)

Case 1:18-cv-01876-PAE Document 142 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 1

- -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------X
RIGOBERTO VASQUEZ and EVA GARCIA, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,

---

-

l~i~,t5C' SlJi·-JY
eocu:-,,u:~rr

~'] "'(''Tnn7''[''Al,LI
r '\J
1:::,.,l:.'. . I\.'-., l ✓ \._,

DOC#:

DATF FiLED: __

----

---

-- ---- - - - - - - - - -

I"lJ , f:',,
',
~l.l

~ll9L?.S??

Plaintiffs,
18 CIVIL 1876 (PAE)

-against-

JUDGMENT
HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING
CORPORATION, LTD., a foreign company, and
DOES 1 THROUGH 100,
Defendants.

-----------------------------------------------------------X
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons
stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 10, 2020, the claims against HSBC Hong Kong
are dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2). Given this dismissal,
the Court does not consider the arguments made by HSBC Hong Kong in its earlier-filed Rule
12(b)( 6) motion; accordingly, this case is closed.
Dated: New York, New York

August 10, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court
BY:
Deputy Clerk