Joint Stock Company "Channel One Russia Worldwide" v. Russian TV Company Inc. et al

Filing 298

ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that parties shall submit any additional comments or suggestions by October 12, 2021. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/6/21) (yv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X : JOINT STOCK COMPANY “CHANNEL ONE : RUSSIA WORLDWIDE”, : Plaintiff, : : -against: : RUSSIAN TV COMPANY INC., et al., : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------------ X 18 Civ. 2318 (LGS) Order LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, the Court has considered the parties’ suggested language for the Permanent Injunction of Defendants; WHEREAS, the Court’s draft of the Permanent Injunction is attached below. It is hereby ORDERED that parties shall submit any additional comments or suggestions by October 12, 2021. Date: October 6, 2021 New York, New York UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X : JOINT STOCK COMPANY “CHANNEL ONE : RUSSIA WORLDWIDE”, : Plaintiff, : : -against: : RUSSIAN TV COMPANY INC., et al., : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------------ X 18 Civ. 2318 (LGS) Permanent Injunction [DRAFT] LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, Plaintiff Joint Stock Company “Channel One Russia Worldwide,” (“Plaintiff” or “Channel One”) commenced this action on March 19, 2018; WHEREAS, Plaintiff broadcast various channels (the “Channels”) originating in the Russian Federation; WHEREAS, on September 22, 2021, this Court found Defendants Russian TV Company, Inc., SR Express Consulting Inc. d/b/a Techstudio, Steven Rudik, Servernaya Inc., and ESTIDesign Inc. (collectively “RTV” or “Defendants”) in violation of Section 605(a) of the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) (ECF 292); WHEREAS, 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(B)(i) permits the Court to “grant temporary and final injunctions on such terms as it may deem reasonable to prevent or restrain violations of subsection [605](a)”; WHEREAS, “Programming” means the channels broadcast by Channel One in the Russian Federation and rebroadcast in the countries throughout the world, including Perviy Kanal (domestic version of Channel One), Channel One Russia Worldwide, Dom Kino, Muzika, Pervogo, Vremya:dalekoe i blizkoe, Carousel International, Telekafe or any other channel that Channel One may in the future broadcast via any medium; WHEREAS, “Distribute” or “Distributing” means to deliver or assist in delivering the Programming to U.S. consumers by any technological means, including via internet protocol television, over the top, cable, satellite, or radio; WHEREAS, the term “Defendants” includes the named Defendants in this action as well as their parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors, divisions, operating units, principals, officers, directors, shareholders, employees, attorneys, members, agents, heirs, representatives, spin-offs, and future assigns. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants are permanently enjoined and restrained from broadcasting, rebroadcasting, transmitting, or Distributing the Programming unless (i) the parties to this action in the future otherwise agree in writing, or (ii) Defendants have contracted to do so with a counterparty, and Plaintiff has authorized the counterparty to transfer or convey to third parties, such as Defendants, the right to broadcast, rebroadcast, transmit, or Distribute the Programming. Defendants shall bear the burden of confirming such authorization and shall bear the risk of failing to do so. It is further ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction for the limited purpose of enforcement of this injunction. Dated: October 6, 2021 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?