Sygall v. Pitsicalis et al

Filing 91

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 90 Order, thaat: the Report and Recommendation issued on May 16, 2022 is adopted in its entirety. On August 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Status of Remaining Claims stating that pending a judgment reflecting t he damages award, the matter was concluded on the merits. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff as against Leon Hendrix in the amount of $14,250, attorneys' fees in the amount of $2,275, plus post-judgment interest of 3.26% pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 until the date ofHendrix's payment and the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 8/22/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (ml)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-02730-VSB-SN Document 91 Filed 08/22/22 Page 1 of 1 usor , !)\'\. DOC t . I E\T £ i :·. ( l RO~IC..\LLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK I! rn.,c =t· i; .\ IT ~-l L_E_D_:__ y-/ 1,,,- i,-r/ 1__ - '2..,,-- ---------------------------------------------------------X DAVID SYGALL., Plaintiff, 18 CIVIL 2730 (VSB) -againstJUDGMENT ANDREW PITSICALIS , LEON HENDRIX, et al., Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 2, 2022 and Order dated August 18, 2022, the Report and Recommendation issued on May 16, 2022 is adopted in its entirety. On August 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Status of Remaining Claims stating that pending a judgment reflecting the damages award, the matter was concluded on the merits. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff as against Leon Hendrix in the amount of $14,250, attorneys' fees in the amount of$2,275, plus post-judgment interest of 3.26% pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 until the date of Hendrix's payment and the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York August 22, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY:_~- - Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?