Peyton Holdings, LLC v. Clover Aviation Company et al
Filing
50
REVISED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 27th day of August, 2020, that Judgment is entered against the Defendants for: 1) monthly rent installments, engine reserve payments, minimum monthly engin e reserves, APU payments, and late charges ("Rent-Related Charges") through July 30,2020 in the amount of $2,266,978.64; and 2) maintenance expenses and repairs on the Aircraft ("Maintenance Expenses") through July 30, 2020 in the amount of $657,837.51. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 8/27/2020) (ks)
Case 1:18-cv-03165-PAC Document 48 Filed 08/11/20 Page 1 of 2
50
08/27/20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Southern District of New York
Peyton Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff,
v.
Clover Aviation Company,
Hayman Woodward, and Leonardo Freitas,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
) Case No. 1:18-cv-3165
)
)
)
)
)
Revised [Proposed] Order on Plaintiff’s Damages for Summary
Judgment
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Peyton Holdings, LLC (“Peyton”) having moved pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for Summary Judgment against Clover Aviation Company,
Hayman Woodward and Leonardo Freitas (together “Defendants”) which Motion for Summary
Judgment was granted in part in an Opinion and Order dated July 24, 2020 (ECF 44),
August
27th
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ______ day of ______________, 2020, that Judgment is
entered against the Defendants for:
1) monthly rent installments, engine reserve payments, minimum monthly engine
reserves, APU payments, and late charges (“Rent-Related Charges”) through July 30,
2020 in the amount of $2,266,978.64; and
Case 1:18-cv-03165-PAC Document 48 Filed 08/11/20 Page 2 of 2
50
08/27/20
2) maintenance expenses and repairs on the Aircraft (“Maintenance Expenses”) through
July 30, 2020 in the amount of $657,837.51.
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED
August 27
__________, 2020
________________________
PAUL A. CROTTY
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?