Tianhai Lace USA, Inc. v. Sixcrispdays, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER: Given that over two years have passed since the filing of the complaint in this action, and given that Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's warning of the consequences of failure to serve or provide good cause for the lack of service, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's action without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate any pending motions and to close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/31/2020) (ks)

Case 1:18-cv-03448-ER Document 11 Filed 08/31/20 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
TIANHAI LACE USA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
ORDER

– against –

18 Civ. 3448 (ER)

SIXCRISPDAYS, INC. and DOES 1–10,
Defendants.
RAMOS, D.J.:
Plaintiff’s last action in this case was to file a request for issuance of summons as
to Sixcrispdays, Inc. on April 24, 2018. Doc. 6. However, the docket does not reflect
that Sixcrispdays, Inc. was ever served. On April 6, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to
show good cause by May 1, 2020 for why service in this action was not completed within
90 days. Doc. 10. More than three months have passed without a response. For the
below reasons, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s action for failure to execute service under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
“If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court
— on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff — must dismiss the action without
prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (emphasis added).
Given that over two years have passed since the filing of the complaint in this
action, and given that Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court’s warning of the
consequences of failure to serve or provide good cause for the lack of service, the Court

Case 1:18-cv-03448-ER Document 11 Filed 08/31/20 Page 2 of 2

DISMISSES Plaintiff’s action without prejudice. fe Clerk of Court is respectfully
directed to terminate any pending motions and to close the case.
It is SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 31, 2020
New York, New York
EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

2