Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation et al
Filing
188
LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Joshua L. Dratel, Esq. dated November 19, 2018 re: Respectfully requesting that the Court allow Wikileaks to file a 25-page separate memo of law in support of its motion to dismiss. Document filed by WikiLeaks.(Dratel, Joshua)
Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 188 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 1
LAW OFFICES OF
JOSHUA L. DRATEL, P.C.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
29 BROADW AY
Suite 1412
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10006
--TELEPHONE (212) 732-0707
FACSIMILE (212) 571-3792
E-MAIL: JDratel@JoshuaDratel.com
JOSHUA L. DRATEL
—
LINDSAY A. LEWIS
WHITNEY G. SCHLIMBACH
STEVEN WRIGHT
Office Manager
November 19, 2018
BY ECF
The Honorable John G. Koeltl
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Re:
Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation (WikiLeaks)
18 Civ. 3501 (JGK)
Dear Judge Koeltl:
This letter is submitted on behalf of defendant Wikileaks, which I represent in the aboveentitled case. In its October 3, 2018, Scheduling Order (ECF Dkt # 181), the Court allotted 15
pages to each defendant beyond the 50 pages allotted for a joint defendants’ memo of law in
support of a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint. It is respectfully requested that the
Court, as it has done with respect to certain other defendants, allot Wikileaks 25 pages for its
individual memo of law. Wikileaks is in many respects in a unique position among the
defendants legally and factually, and as a result will be raising issues that the joint memo of law
will not be covering. I have spoken to Joseph M. Sellers, Esq., of Cohen Millstein Sellers &
Toll, PLLC, counsel for Plaintiffs, and he has informed me that Plaintiffs consent to this
application.
Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the Court allow Wikileaks to file a 25-page
separate memo of law in support of its motion to dismiss.
Respectfully submitted,
Joshua L. Dratel
JLD/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?