Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation et al
Filing
219
LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Joshua L. Dratel, Esq. dated March 4, 2019 re: Respectfully requesting that the Court allow Wikileaks to file a Supplemental Memorandum of Law. Document filed by WikiLeaks.(Dratel, Joshua)
Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 219 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 1
LAW OFFICES OF
JOSHUA L. DRATEL, P.C.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
29 BROADWAY
Suite 1412
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10006
--TELEPHONE (212) 732-0707
FACSIMILE (212) 571-3792
E-MAIL: JDratel@JoshuaDratel.com
JOSHUA L. DRATEL
—
LINDSAY A. LEWIS
WHITNEY G. SCHLIMBACH
STEVEN WRIGHT
Office Manager
March 4, 2019
BY ECF
The Honorable John G. Koeltl
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Re:
Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation (WikiLeaks)
18 Civ. 3501 (JGK)
Dear Judge Koeltl:
This letter is submitted on behalf of defendant Wikileaks, which I represent in the aboveentitled case, and seeks permission to file a Supplemental Memorandum of Law of ten pages
(2,527 words) in support of WikiLeaks’s previously filed Motion to Dismiss (ECF Dkt #s 206,
207 & 208). While the Court’s initial October 3, 2018 Scheduling Order (ECF Dkt #181) did not
account for combined page limits for a second round of motions to dismiss, this application is
being made in an abundance of caution. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint does not disturb
the analysis in WikiLeaks’s initial Memo of Law (ECF Dkt #208), but does add some material
that is addressed in the Supplemental Memo of Law. As a result, the Supplemental Memo of
Law responds exclusively to specific additions in the Second Amended Complaint, and it is
respectfully requested that the Court grant permission to file it as a supplement to WikiLeaks’s
initial motion to dismiss.
Respectfully submitted,
Joshua L. Dratel
JLD/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?