Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation et al

Filing 219

LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Joshua L. Dratel, Esq. dated March 4, 2019 re: Respectfully requesting that the Court allow Wikileaks to file a Supplemental Memorandum of Law. Document filed by WikiLeaks.(Dratel, Joshua)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 219 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 1 LAW OFFICES OF JOSHUA L. DRATEL, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 29 BROADWAY Suite 1412 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10006 --TELEPHONE (212) 732-0707 FACSIMILE (212) 571-3792 E-MAIL: JDratel@JoshuaDratel.com JOSHUA L. DRATEL — LINDSAY A. LEWIS WHITNEY G. SCHLIMBACH STEVEN WRIGHT Office Manager March 4, 2019 BY ECF The Honorable John G. Koeltl United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation (WikiLeaks) 18 Civ. 3501 (JGK) Dear Judge Koeltl: This letter is submitted on behalf of defendant Wikileaks, which I represent in the aboveentitled case, and seeks permission to file a Supplemental Memorandum of Law of ten pages (2,527 words) in support of WikiLeaks’s previously filed Motion to Dismiss (ECF Dkt #s 206, 207 & 208). While the Court’s initial October 3, 2018 Scheduling Order (ECF Dkt #181) did not account for combined page limits for a second round of motions to dismiss, this application is being made in an abundance of caution. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint does not disturb the analysis in WikiLeaks’s initial Memo of Law (ECF Dkt #208), but does add some material that is addressed in the Supplemental Memo of Law. As a result, the Supplemental Memo of Law responds exclusively to specific additions in the Second Amended Complaint, and it is respectfully requested that the Court grant permission to file it as a supplement to WikiLeaks’s initial motion to dismiss. Respectfully submitted, Joshua L. Dratel JLD/

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?