Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation et al

Filing 228

LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. dated March 4, 2019 re: Request for Oral Argument on the Campaign's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. Document filed by Donald J. Trump For President, Inc..(Carvin, Michael)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 228 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 1 51 LOUISIANA AVENUE, N.W. • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001.2113 TELEPHONE: +1.202.879.3939 • FACSIMILE: +1.202.626.1700 Direct Number: (202) 879-7643 macarvin@JonesDay.com March 4, 2019 The Honorable John G. Koeltl United States District Judge Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Democratic National Committee v. Russian Federation (1:18-cv-03501-JGK) Dear Judge Koeltl: I represent Defendant Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (“the Campaign”) in the above-captioned matter. Pursuant to Rule 2.G of Your Honor’s Individual Practices, the Campaign respectfully requests that this Court hear Oral Argument on the Campaign’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, filed on March 4, 2019 (ECF No. 226). Sincerely, /s/ Michael A. Carvin Michael A. Carvin (pro hac vice) JONES DAY 51 Louisiana Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 879-3939 macarvin@jonesday.com Counsel for Defendant Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. cc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF) ALKHOBAR  AMS TERDAM  ATL ANTA  BEIJ ING  B OS TON  BRISBANE  BRUSSEL S  CHICAGO  CLEVEL AND  COLU MBUS  DALL AS DETROIT  DUBAI  DÜSSELDORF  FRANKFUR T  HO NG KONG  HOUS TON  IRVINE  LONDON  LOS ANGELES  MADRID  MELBOURNE MEXICO CIT Y  MIAMI  MIL AN  MINNEAPOLIS  MOSCOW  MUNICH  NEW YORK  PAR IS  PER TH  PITTSB URGH  RIYADH SAN DIEGO  SAN FRANCISCO  SÃO PAULO  SHANGHAI  SILICO N VALLEY  SINGAPORE  S YDNEY  TAIPEI  TOKYO  WASHINGTO N

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?