Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation et al

Filing 246

LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Joshua L. Dratel, Esq. dated May 30, 2019 re: Respectfully requesting a one-week extension of the due date for Wikileaks' Reply Memorandum of Law.. Document filed by WikiLeaks.(Dratel, Joshua)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 246 Filed 05/30/19 Page 1 of 1 LAW OFFICES OF JOSHUA L. DRATEL, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 29 BROADWAY Suite 1412 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10006 --TELEPHONE (212) 732-0707 FACSIMILE (212) 571-3792 E-MAIL: JDratel@JoshuaDratel.com JOSHUA L. DRATEL — LINDSAY A. LEWIS WHITNEY G. SCHLIMBACH STEVEN WRIGHT Office Manager May 30, 2019 BY ECF The Honorable John G. Koeltl United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation (WikiLeaks), 18 Civ. 3501 (JGK) Dear Judge Koeltl: This letter is submitted on behalf of defendant Wikileaks, which I represent in the aboveentitled case, and seeks a one-week extension – from June 3, 2019, until June 10, 2019 – of the due date for WikiLeaks’ Reply Memorandum of Law in support of WikiLeaks’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. I have spoken with Geoffrey A. Graber, Esq., of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC (Plaintiff’s Attorneys), and he has informed me that Plaintiff consents to this application. The reasons for the extension are a concurrent deadline next week for pretrial motions in a criminal case, United States v. Blondet, 16 Cr. 387 (JMF), as well as the logistical challenges of timely communication and coordination with lawyers overseas who are handling other pressing recent matters related to WikiLeaks. Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the due date for WikiLeaks’ Reply Memorandum of Law be extended one week until June 10, 2019. Respectfully submitted, Joshua L. Dratel JLD/

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?