Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation et al
Filing
246
LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Joshua L. Dratel, Esq. dated May 30, 2019 re: Respectfully requesting a one-week extension of the due date for Wikileaks' Reply Memorandum of Law.. Document filed by WikiLeaks.(Dratel, Joshua)
Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 246 Filed 05/30/19 Page 1 of 1
LAW OFFICES OF
JOSHUA L. DRATEL, P.C.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
29 BROADWAY
Suite 1412
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10006
--TELEPHONE (212) 732-0707
FACSIMILE (212) 571-3792
E-MAIL: JDratel@JoshuaDratel.com
JOSHUA L. DRATEL
—
LINDSAY A. LEWIS
WHITNEY G. SCHLIMBACH
STEVEN WRIGHT
Office Manager
May 30, 2019
BY ECF
The Honorable John G. Koeltl
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Re:
Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation (WikiLeaks),
18 Civ. 3501 (JGK)
Dear Judge Koeltl:
This letter is submitted on behalf of defendant Wikileaks, which I represent in the aboveentitled case, and seeks a one-week extension – from June 3, 2019, until June 10, 2019 – of the
due date for WikiLeaks’ Reply Memorandum of Law in support of WikiLeaks’ Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. I have spoken with Geoffrey A. Graber, Esq.,
of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC (Plaintiff’s Attorneys), and he has informed me that
Plaintiff consents to this application. The reasons for the extension are a concurrent deadline
next week for pretrial motions in a criminal case, United States v. Blondet, 16 Cr. 387 (JMF), as
well as the logistical challenges of timely communication and coordination with lawyers overseas
who are handling other pressing recent matters related to WikiLeaks.
Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the due date for WikiLeaks’ Reply
Memorandum of Law be extended one week until June 10, 2019.
Respectfully submitted,
Joshua L. Dratel
JLD/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?