Thomas v. Five Star Electric et al

Filing 126

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 125 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations in favor of Dept of EEOC, Five Star Electric Corp., Metropolitian Transportation Authority, New York State Dept. of Human Rights against Caze D. Thomas. It is hereby ORDER ED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 16, 2022, the Court, except as noted above, has OVERRULED Plaintiff's objections, ADOPTED the R&R, and has GRANTED Defendants' motions to dis miss. The Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims against Five Star under the NYCHRL and has DISMISSED them without prejudice and has DISMISSED the remainder of Plaintiff's claims with prejudice. The Court has also REJECTED R&R II in its entirety and has DENIED Plaintiff's request for a writ of prohibition as moot; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 9/19/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)

Case 1:18-cv-03691-AT-RWL Document 126 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------X
CAZÉ D. THOMAS,

18 CIVIL 3691 (AT)(RWL)

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT

-againstFIVE STAR ELECTRIC, DEPARTMENT OF
EEOC, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS,
and METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------X

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons
stated in the Court's Order dated September 16, 2022, the Court, except as noted above, has
OVERRULED Plaintiff's objections, ADOPTED the R&R, and has GRANTED Defendants'
motions to dismiss. The Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's
claims against Five Star under the NYCHRL and has DISMISSED them without prejudice and
has DISMISSED the remainder of Plaintiff's claims with prejudice. The Court has also
REJECTED R&R II in its entirety and has DENIED Plaintiff's request for a writ of prohibition
as moot; accordingly, the case is closed.
Dated: New York, New York
September 19, 2022

BY:

RUBY J. KRAJICK
_________________________
Clerk of Court
_________________________
Deputy Clerk