Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
Filing 380
ORDER: Construing the plaintiff's letter of June 8, 2020 (Docket # 379) as a motion for reconsideration of the Court's Order of June 8, 2020 (Docket # 378), it is denied. To the extent it was intended to seek new forms of relief, it violate s the directive in the Order of May 21, 2020 (Docket # 358). On a separate point, the Court notes that this letter contains what is characterized as the home address of a City employee, as well as the birthdate of that individual. The Court directs t he Clerk to substitute a version of Docket # 379 that redacts this individual's home address and birthdate. In addition, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff shall not file any papers in the futurecontaining the home address, personal telephone n umber, personal email address, social security number, birthdate, names of relatives, or any other personal information (other than name and information relating to business or employment) of any person. To the extent in the future some original docu ment relevant to this case contains such personal information, such information shall be redacted. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 6/10/2020) (ama) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
