U.S. Bank National Association v. Triaxx Asset Management LLC et al

Filing 410

ORDER terminating 409 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The Court will conduct a scheduling conference on February 11, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. The conference will be conducted using the Court's videoconferencing technology (Microsoft Teams). Members of the public may dial in to the audio-only line: (917) 933-2166, 253507310#. Chambers will email a video link to counsel. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the following questions: 1. What pleading is the su bject of the Trustee's planned motion to dismiss? 2. Whether or not the Complaint recently filed in this action at Dkt. No. 406 is the subject of the planned motion, should that Complaint be severed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 and proceed as a separate action? 3. If the Complaint is severed, does that affect the proposed motion briefing schedule? (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 2/9/2022) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-04044-BCM Document 410 Filed 02/09/22 Page 1 of 2 90 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 212-210-9400 | Fax: 212-210-9444 Alexander S. Lorenzo Direct Dial: 212-210-9528 Email: alexander.lorenzo@alston.com February 4, 2022 VIA ECF The Honorable Barbara Moses United States Magistrate Judge Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007-1312 Re: 2/9/22 U.S. Bank National Association v. Triaxx Asset Management LLC et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-04044 (BCM) Dear Judge Moses: We represent U.S. Bank National Association, solely in its capacity as trustee (the “Trustee”), as Defendant in the newly filed action (Case No. 1:21-cv-11019) consolidated with the above-referenced action (the “Action”). With the parties having executed and filed a Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge earlier today (Dkt. No. 408), I write pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d) and 2(a) and (f) of the Court’s Individual Practices regarding the briefing schedule for the Trustee’s forthcoming motion to dismiss. The parties have met and conferred and reached agreement on the following schedule, which they respectfully request that the Court so-order: - Moving Brief: April 8, 2022 Opposition Brief: May 18, 2022 Reply Brief: June 3, 2022 This schedule reflects a ten (10) day extension to the Trustee’s current March 29, 2022 response deadline, which is sixty (60) days from the date of the Trustee’s executed waiver of service pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As part of the agreement that was reached on the briefing schedule, Plaintiff has consented to this extension. There have been no previous requests for an extension. We are available at the Court’s convenience should Your Honor require any additional information. Alston & Bird LLP www.alston.com Atlanta | Beijing | Brussels | Charlotte | Dallas | Fort Worth | London | Los Angeles | New York | Raleigh | San Francisco | Silicon Valley | Washington, D.C. Case 1:18-cv-04044-BCM Document 410 Filed 02/09/22 Page 2 of 2 February 4, 2022 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Adobo Alexander S. Lorenzo cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF) The Court will conduct a scheduling conference on February 11, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. The conference will be conducted using the Court's videoconferencing technology (Microsoft Teams). Members of the public may dial in to the audio-only line: (917) 933-2166, 253507310#. Chambers will email a video link to counsel. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the following questions: 1. What pleading is the subject of the Trustee's planned motion to dismiss? 2. Whether or not the Complaint recently filed in this action at Dkt. No. 406 is the subject of the planned motion, should that Complaint be severed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 and proceed as a separate action? 3. If the Complaint is severed, does that affect the proposed motion briefing schedule? SO ORDERED. ________________________________ Barbara Moses United States Magistrate Judge February 9, 2022

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?