SKAT v. The Bradley London Pension Plan et al

Filing 187

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 23 (Order on Motion for Foreign Judicial Assistance): granting (598) Motion for Discovery in case 1:18-md-02865-LAK. In view of the completion of the Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of plaintiff and the uncertain ability to obtai n testimony from Mr. Jeppesen and Ms. Zester, the motion of certain defendants for international judicial assistance to obtain evidence from the Kingdom of Denmark (18-md-2865, Dkt 598) is granted. Movants shall submit proposed execution copies of l etters of request to chambers for review and signature. The Clerk shall spread this ruling to all cases identified in the caption of Dkt 598. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/04/2021) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al. (ama)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x In re CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK (SKAT) TAX REFUND LITIGATION 18-md-2865 (LAK) This paper applies to: All Cases Identified in caption on Dkt. 598 -------------------------------------x PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 23 (Order on Motion for Foreign Judicial Assistance) LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. In view of the completion of the Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of plaintiff and the uncertain ability to obtain testimony from Mr. Jeppesen and Ms. Zester , the motion of certain defendants for international judicial assistance to obtain evidence from the Kingdom of Denmark (18-md-2865, Dkt 598) is granted. Movants shall submit proposed execution copies of letters of request to chambers for review and signature. The Clerk shall spread this ruling to all cases identified in the caption of Dkt 598. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 4, 2021 /s/ Lewis A. Kaplan ____________________________________ Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?