Scotto v. City of New York et al

Filing 66

RULE 502(d)ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored information (ESI) or other information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a w aiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). 2. No thing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or other information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 2/4/2020) (js)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2/4/2020

Mariano Scotto,
Plaintiff,

1:18-cv-04228 (LTS) (SDA)

-against-

RULE 502(d) ORDER

City of New York, et al.,
Defendants.
STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge:
It is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.

The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically

stored information (“ESI”) or other information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a
waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state
proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by
Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).
2.

Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s right to

conduct a review of documents, ESI or other information (including metadata) for relevance,
responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before
production.
SO ORDERED.
DATED:

New York, New York
February 4, 2020
______________________________
STEWART D. AARON
United States Magistrate Judge