Innovatus Capital Partners, LLC v. Neuman et al
Filing
298
ORDER denying 283 Letter Motion to Seal. Denied. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 2/14/2022) (rro)
Case 1:18-cv-04252-LLS Document 298 Filed 02/14/22 Page 1 of 2
LSDC SDN\'
DOCt;M F '-T
ELECTk U'\lC .-\LLY FILED
ORfG!f lAL_
DOC #: _ _----:---=---___,~
n;
COVINGTON
BEIJING
BRUSSELS
LOS ANGELES
DUBAI
NEW YO R K
JOHANNESBURG
SAN FRANCISCO
LONDON
SEOUL
, __
Tl " t
! l 1· D: 2.1,.., t'\., Covington & '
urling LLP
r
-======~;t.¢,m~~et,
NW:
Washington, DC 20 001-4956
T +1 20 2 662 6000
February 2, 2022
The Honorable Louis L. ~ n
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 21-C
New York, New York 10007
Re: MV Realty, PBC, LLC, v. lnnovatus Capital Partners, LLC (1:18-cv07142); lnnovatus v. Neuman et. al. (1:18-cv-04252)
- ~~ .
1
Dear Ju::e::::'::behalf of MV Realty to respectfully request permission to file under seal
portions of MV's February 1, 2022 letter. MV's letter refers to information from documents that ~
have been designated by Innovatus "Confidential" under the Protective Order.
~~tc-v"'
Although there is a presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents, a court
may seal judicial documents if "closure is essential to preserve higher values and closure is
narrowly tailored to serve that interest." Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110,
120 (2d Cir. 2006). The Protective Order provides: "Where any Confidential or Highly
Confidential Materials, or Information derived therefrom, is included in any motion or other
proceeding in this Proceeding, the Parties and any involved non-party shall follow the
procedures outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, the Standing Order Regarding Electronic Filing Under
Seal in Civil and Miscellaneous Cases dated December 19, 2019 , and the Individual Rules of
Practice issued by the Court, or any Standing Procedural Order subsequently issued by the
Court." On June 1, 2021 , the Court entered an Order in connection with Innovatus' request to
seal certain portions of MV's May 24, 2021 letter, which provided further guidance regarding the
standard for sealing. See Dkt. 171.
Accordingly, MV requests permission to file portions of its February 1, 2022 letter under
seal, subject to Innovatus' position as to whether they should be sealed.
Sincerely,
s/ Jason C. Raofield
Jason C. Raofield
., \ \ '1 \ ~ ,_
r
Case 1:18-cv-04252-LLS Document 298 Filed 02/14/22 Page 2 of 2
Dechert
LLP
Cira Centre
- 2929 Arch Street
Philadelph ia, PA 19104-2808
+1 215 994 4000 Main
+1 215 994 2222 Fax
www.dechert.com
MICHAEL H. MCGINLEY
February 9, 2022
michael. mcginley@dechert.com
+1 215 994 2463 Direct
+1 215 655 2131 Fax
VIA ECF
The Honorable Louis L. Stanton
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United State Courthouse
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
Re: lnnovatus Capital Partners, LLC v. Neuman, No. 1: 18-cv-04252-LLS (S.D.N.Y.) 1 and
MV Realty PBC, LLC v. Jnnovatus Capital Partners, LLC, No. 1 :18-cv-07142-LLS
(S.D.N.Y.)
Dear Judge Stanton:
We write on behalf of Innovatus Capital Partners, LLC ("lnnovatus") in response to the MV Realty
Parties' letter request (Dkt. 283) to seal portions of their February 1, 2022 letter to the Court (the
"Letter") (Dkt. 284 ).
Innovatus has reviewed the portions of the Letter proposed to be redacted by the MV Realty Parties
and lnnovatus does not seek sealed treatment of this information.
:i~'~
Michael H. McGinley
CC: All counsel of record (via ECF)
1
All citations to "Dkt." herein refer to the docket entries in Innovatus Capital Partners, LLC v. Neuman,
No. 1: 18-cv-04252-LLS (S .D.N.Y.).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?