Innovatus Capital Partners, LLC v. Neuman et al

Filing 324

ORDER granting 312 Letter Motion to Seal. After inspection of the exhibits, this application is granted and the four exhibits may be sealed on the above-mentioned understanding. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 3/29/2022) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-04252-LLS Document 322 Filed 03/24/22 Page 1 of 1 \ ll •, ,.,., ~~ 0 1.1.J ..J COVINGTON BEIJING BRUSSELS LOS ANGELES SHANGHAI DUBAI NEW YORK JOHANNESBURG SAN FRANCISCO SILICON VALLEY -.. Covington & Burling LLP One CityCenter 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001-495 T + 1 202 662 6000 LONDON SEOUL WASHINGTON ~,~EMO ENDG~~SED .... E-- z 7. ,J, ,., C fl .,..J ~ w.. MV Realty therefore requests that the Court grant Innovatus' motion to seal with respect to Exhibits 5, 6, 7, and 12. +~-h~ l-1 """'1 14l~ bt \ !, ~ ~~ I,,. ,,,,_ ,.{.,,J ""' -i-R... Sincerely, s/ Jason C. Raofield Jason C. Raofield ~~M ~~4'\ 'vvyv~~~~1 ~ L.. · S t~t~ ~ Q 0 Of the twelve exhibits attached to Innovatus' motion, MV Realty seeks to seal only four: Exhibits 5, 6, 7, and 12. These exhibits are confidential draft presentation materials relating to MV Realty's business, which include detailed information regarding its "business thought processes" and the "roadmap" or approach it has used in its RTL business. (Dkt. 201.) MV Realty would be harmed by the disclosure of these materials to competitors, including Innovatus, which has been attempting to pursue an RTL business of its own. These materials are squarely within the type of materials that the Court has allowed the parties to seal on the basis of the "muchreduced level of secrecy required to be shown to justify sealing materials" at this stage of the litigation. (Id.) MV Realty is aware of the Court's order indicating that materials which are sealed at this stage may nonetheless "need to be revealed at trial." (Dkt, 235.) '1 ~ ,-. ...... •t k, We write in response to Innovatus' March 17, 2022 letter motion (Dkt, 312) seeking leave to file under seal twelve exhibits to Innovatus' March 17 motion to stay proceedings pending appeal (Dkt. 313) on the basis of confidentiality designations made by MV Realty when producing documents pursuant to the Protective Order. 1 ~J ~t~ I C u Dear Judge Stanton: 3/ ,._~ /i2. All citations to "Dkt." refer to the docket in Innovatus Capital Partners, LLC v. Neuman, et al., No. 1-18-cv-04252-LLS (S.D.N.Y.). Innovatus filed an identical letter in MV Realty PBC, LLC v. Innovatus Capital Partners, LLC, No. 1-18-cv-07142-LLS (S.D.N.Y.). See Dkt. 268, 269. 1 I . ,,, ~ I'" ~ l Re: MV Realty, PBC, LLC, v. Innovatus Capital Partners, LLC (1:18-cv07142); Innovatus v. Neuman et al. (1:18-cv-04252) r ~ 1.vu~ c;-., ~-\ ,.,,,.. The Honorable Louis L Stanton United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 21-C New York, New York 10007 ~ - ..~ l.. March 24, 2022 />c~ i;-\ ·~ ,- ..... ~ 0

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?