Capak v. Epps et al

Filing 111

ORDER: Pursuant to defense counsel's request to withdraw as counsel at ECF No. 110, the Court requests that both Defendant Smith and his attorney, Douglas Doneson, attend an ex parte teleconference with the Court to discuss defense counsel's request to withdraw and Defendant's response to the request. The call will take place on January 8, 2021 at 12:30 p.m. Both Defendant and his attorney must attend. Please call (866) 434-5269, access code: 4858267 at the sch eduled time. A private security code will be provided to the teleconference participants in advance of the call. ( Telephone Conference set for 1/8/2021 at 12:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 12/28/2020) (mro)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-04325-RA-KHP Document 111 Filed 12/28/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X RICHARD J. CAPAK, 12/28/2020 18-CV-4325 (RA) (KHP) Plaintiff, ORDER -againstRORY DORALL SMITH, Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------X KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge: Pursuant to defense counsel’s request to withdraw as counsel at ECF No. 110, the Court requests that both Defendant Smith and his attorney, Douglas Doneson, attend an ex parte teleconference with the Court to discuss defense counsel’s request to withdraw and Defendant’s response to the request. The call will take place on January 8, 2021 at 12:30 p.m. Both Defendant and his attorney must attend. Please call (866) 434-5269, access code: 4858267 at the scheduled time. A private security code will be provided to the teleconference participants in advance of the call. SO ORDERED. DATED: December 28, 2020 New York, New York ______________________________ KATHARINE H. PARKER United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?