Capak v. Epps et al

Filing 81

ORDER: If Plaintiff seeks to file any portion of these documents under seal or in redacted form, Plaintiff must do so in accordance with Paragraph 5(A) of this Court's Individual Rules & Practices in Civil Cases and the Southern District's Local Rules. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/10/2020) (ks)

USDC-SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATE FILED:
;r7J

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

'J- / (' /

RICHARD J. CAPAK,
Plaintiff,
No.

V.

18-CV-4325 (RA)
ORDER

T AUHEED EPPS also known as 2 CHAINZ
and RORY DORALL SMITH,
Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:
On February 7, 2020, Plaintiff Richard J. Capak filed his opposition to Defendant Tauheed
Epps' motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. 79. In connection with his opposition, Plaintiff also
filed a Declaration of Chad B Russell, Dkt. 78, and a response to Defendant Epps' Rule 56.1
Statement of Material Facts, Dkt. 80. Plaintiff inexplicably filed the majority of all three documents
in "redacted" form on the docket, despite the fact that Plaintiff never requested -let alone was
granted-leave to file any of these documents under seal. Plaintiff shall refile his opposition,
Declaration of Chad B Russell, and response to Defendant Epps' Rule 56.1 Statement of Material
Facts publicly on the docket. If Plaintiff seeks to file any portion of these documents under seal or
in redacted form, Plaintiff must do so in accordance with Paragraph 5(A) of this Court's Individual
Rules & Practices in Civil Cases and the Southern District's Local Rules.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 10, 2020
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge