Malloy v. Sullivan
Filing
93
ORDER granting 89 Letter Motion to Seal. The Application is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/6/2021) (tg)
Case 1:19-cv-06533-PGG-KNF Document 89 Filed 09/03/21 Page 1 of 1
1:18-cv-04756-PGG-KNF
93
09/06/21
Selendy & Gay PLLC
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York NY 10104
212 390 9000
September 3, 2021
Via ECF
Honorable Paul G. Gardephe
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re:
September 6, 2021
Malloy v. Pompeo, No. 18 Civ. 4756 (PGG) (KNF)
Malloy v. U.S. Dep’t of State, No. 19 Civ. 6533 (PGG) (KNF)
Dear Judge Gardephe:
We write as limited pro bono counsel to Plaintiff Jane Malloy in the abovereferenced cases. We write to respectfully request that the Court enter an order permitting
the sealed filing of Plaintiff’s September 3, 2021 letter in response to Defendants’ August
31, 2021 letter-motion (Case No. 19 Civ. 6533, ECF No. 86) for a pre-motion conference
regarding Plaintiff’s subpoena to depose Harry Ting on September 1, 2021.
The Court granted Defendants’ August 31, 2021 application for their unredacted
pre-motion letter to be filed under seal and accessible only by counsel. Case No. 18 Civ.
4756, ECF No. 88; Case No. 19 Civ. 6533, ECF No. 88. We respectfully request that our
responsive letter be afforded the same treatment. If permitted to file our response under
seal, we will file a redacted version of our responsive letter on the public docket.
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Michael Duke
Michael Duke
Cc: All Counsel (by ECF)
Jane Malloy (by ECF)
s/ Babak Ghafarzade
Babak Ghafarzade
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?