Rouviere et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al

Filing 302

ORDER granting 301 Letter Motion to Seal. Motion to Seal Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 5/13/2021) (js)

Download PDF
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 11 South Meridian Street Indianapolis, IN 46204-3535 U.S.A. (317) 236-1313 Fax (317) 231-7433 J.T. Larson 317-231-7729 Jt.larson@btlaw.com www.btlaw.com May 6, 2021 Via Electronic Court Filing Honorable Stewart D. Aaron, U.S.M.J. Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007-1312 Re: Letter Motion to Seal Exhibit A to DePuy’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Request to Modify Scheduling Order and Reopen Expert Discovery [ECF No. 300] 18-CV-04814 Dear Judge Aaron: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (“DePuy”) (now known as Medical Device Business Services, Inc.), pursuant to this Court’s local rules and Your Honor’s individual rules of practice, respectfully requests that the Court seal from public view certain portions of the Disqualified Expert’s original report. DePuy has filed a proposed redacted version of this document as Exhibit A to DePuy’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Request to Modify Scheduling Order and Reopen Expert Discovery [ECF No. 300-1.] Allowing redactions to this document comports with this Court’s prior orders regarding the Disqualified Expert. [See ECF No. 195 (Order Granting Letter Motion to Seal).] For simplicity, DePuy has copied verbatim Howmedica Osteonics Corporation’s redactions to this same document, which the Court has already deemed appropriate to protect from disclosure the identity of the Disqualified Expert. [See ECF No. 215-3, pp. 3-62.] Therefore, DePuy requests that the Court accept the redacted version of the Disqualified Expert’s original report and continue to protect the Disqualified Expert’s identity from public disclosure. Very truly yours, /s/ J.T. Larson J.T. Larson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?