Walker v. City of New York et al
Filing
36
ORDER: In light of the information set forth in the Status Report from Corporation Counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint status letter to the Court no later than May 8, 2020. In that letter, the parties shall address : (1) the status of the CCRB proceedings; (2) the status of Gibsons representation by counsel and of the representation of the other individual defendants named in the complaint, including the names and contact information for each counsel; and (3 ) each party's position on lifting the stay of this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the individual defendants shall promptly enter a notice of appearance on the Court docket. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to correct the docket sheet to reflect that the New York City Law Department, Office of Corporation Counsel, does not represent any of the individual defendants in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 4/15/2020) Attorney Kathleen Deborah Reilly and Steve Stavridis terminated. (ks)
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 4/15/2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MORTIA WALKER, on behalf of her infant
children S.W. and K.W.,
Plaintiff,
-against-
1:18-cv-04815 (MKV)
CITY OF NEW YORK, POLICE OFFICER
PHILLIP PENA, POLICE OFFICER
PASQUALE DETHOMAS, SERGEANT
GIBSON, and JOHN DOE POLICE #1-2,
ORDER
Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
By Order dated October 15, 2018, the above-captioned § 1983 action was stayed pending
the resolution of an investigation into the underlying incident by the Civilian Complaint Review
Board (“CCRB”) Administrative Prosecution Unit (“APU”). [ECF #22] On February 6, 2020,
the case was reassigned to me for all purposes. In an Order dated March 6, 2020, the Court
directed Defendant City of New York to file a letter updating the Court on the status of the
CCRB investigation and subsequent disciplinary proceedings. [ECF #34]
In its letter, dated March 11, 2020, the City informed the Court that although the trial has
concluded, the disciplinary proceedings will not be concluded until the Police Commissioner
issues a final decision. [ECF #35] The City further informed the Court that Plaintiff’s position
is that the stay of this action should be lifted, notwithstanding the fact that the Commissioner has
not yet rendered a decision, and that the City does not oppose lifting the stay. [Id. at 2] Counsel
for the City also explained that he asked counsel for Defendant Gibson for his position on this
question, but was informed that new counsel had taken over Gibson’s representation and that he
should await a response from Gibson’s new counsel. [Id. at 2 & n.2] Finally, the City alerted the
1
Court to errors on the docket sheet related to the representation of the individual defendants.
Specifically, the docket sheet erroneously lists counsel for the City as counsel for Defendants
Pena, Dethomas, Gibson, and John Doe Police Officers #1-2.
In light of the information set forth in the Status Report from Corporation Counsel, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint status letter to the Court no later than
May 8, 2020. In that letter, the parties shall address: (1) the status of the CCRB proceedings; (2)
the status of Gibson’s representation by counsel and of the representation of the other individual
defendants named in the complaint, including the names and contact information for each
counsel; and (3) each party’s position on lifting the stay of this action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the individual defendants shall promptly
enter a notice of appearance on the Court docket.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to correct the docket sheet to reflect that the
New York City Law Department, Office of Corporation Counsel, does not represent any of the
individual defendants in this case.
SO ORDERED
Dated: April 15, 2020
New York, New York
_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?