Diaz v. New York Paving Inc.
Filing
294
ORDER: granting 292 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Extension granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 7/21/2023) (ama)
Case 1:18-cv-04910-ALC-GWG Document 292 Filed 07/21/23 Page 1 of 1
MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN & BREITSTONE, LLP
190 Willis Avenue, Mineola, NY 11501 • T. 516.747.0300
www.meltzerlippe.com
MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
Christopher P. Hampton, Esq.
Writer’s Direct Dial: (516) 747-0300 x 153
Writer’s Facsimile: (516) 237-2893
Email: champton@meltzerlippe.com
July 21, 2023
VIA ECF
Honorable Gabriel Gorenstein
United States Magistrate Judge
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl St., Courtroom 6B
New York, NY 10007
Re:
Diaz v. New York Paving, Inc.
Docket No. 18-CV-04910(ALC)(GWG)
MLGB File No. 09676-00110
Dear Judge Gorenstein:
This firm represents Defendant New York Paving (“Defendant”) in the above-referenced
matter. We write pursuant to Your Honors’ Individual Practice Rule 1(E) to request a brief, two
day adjournment of the time by which the Parties must submit the Class Notice to Judge Carter,
as noted in Your Honor’s order dated June 7, 2023 (ECF No. 288).
Pursuant to Rule 1(E): (1) Defendant wishes to adjourn the Class Notice submission
deadline from July 31, 2023 to August 2, 2023; (2) this is the first request for an extension; (3)
the Parties need the extension as they are continuing to negotiate the terms of the Class Notice
and need the additional time to resolve any remaining disputes; and (4) Plaintiff consents. We
also note this request affects no other deadlines or dates.
As such, we respectfully request the deadline by which the Parties must submit the Class
Notice for approval to Judge Carter be adjourned from July 31, 2023 to August 2, 2023.
We sincerely thank the Court for its time and consideration of the foregoing request.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
cc:
All Counsel of Record (via ECF)
Christopher P. Hampton
Extension granted.
So Ordered.
July 21, 2023
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?