Diaz v. New York Paving Inc.

Filing 325

ORDER: In light of the pendency of the discovery dispute (Docket # 320), and its apparent relationship to the proposed motion to dismiss, the deadlines for the briefing of that motion as set forth in Docket # 319 are adjourned sine die. Within three business days of the Court's ruling on the discovery dispute, the parties shall propose a new briefing schedule. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 6/13/2024) (cf)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
EDGARDO DIAZ
:
Plaintiff,
-v.-

:

ORDER

:
18 Civ. 4910 (ALC) (GWG)

NEW YORK PAVING INC.,

:

Defendant.
:
---------------------------------------------------------------X
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In light of the pendency of the discovery dispute (Docket # 320), and its apparent
relationship to the proposed motion to dismiss, the deadlines for the briefing of that motion as set
forth in Docket # 319 are adjourned sine die. Within three business days of the Court’s ruling on
the discovery dispute, the parties shall propose a new briefing schedule.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 13, 2024
New York, New York