Diaz v. New York Paving Inc.

Filing 90

ORDER granting 89 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. SO ORDERED. Discovery Hearing set for 4/3/2020 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 3/04/2020) (ama)

Download PDF
-~~~~cv-04910-ALC-GWG Document 89 Filed 03/04/20 Page 1 of 1 Meltzer Lippe MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN & BREITSTONE, LLP 190 Willis Avenue, Mineola, NY 11501 • T. 516.747.0300 www.meltzerlippe.com r "' ···· , J' Nicholas P, Melito, Esq. Writer's Direct Dial: (516) 747-0300x 183 Writer's Facsimile: (516) 237-2893 Email: nmelito@meltzerlippe.com March 4, 2020 VIAECF Honorable Gabriel Gorenstein United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl St., Courtroom 6B New York, NY 10007 Re: ME~10 ENDORSED Diaz v. New York Paving, Inc. Docket No. 18-CV-04910(ALC)(GWG) MLGB File No. 09676-00110 Dear Judge Gorenstein: This firm represents Defendant New York Paving ("Defendant" or "NY Paving") in the above-referenced matter. Due to a conflict of Defense Counsel, we write, with consent of Plaintiff, to seek an adjournment of the Court Conference currently scheduled for March 16, 2020 at 11 :00 a.m. regarding the parties' dispute with respect to the substance of the proposed order. In accordance with Your Honor's Individual Practices, Section l(F), the parties have conferred and propose the morning of Friday, April 3, 2020 to reschedule the above-referenced conference. Your Deputy Clerk has informed our office this date and time is available with the Court. NY Paving sincerely thanks the Court for its time and consideration of the foregoing request to adjourn the court c rch 16, 2020 until April 3, 2020M'"'l ( l Q7J q .N\ . Respectfully submitted, / NPM/kc cc: 1001005.2 All Counsel of Record (via ECF) /0,~ V / ' ,,-✓. ,. ·-Z--(_~ Nicholas P. Melito

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?