Ye v. 2953 Broadway LLC et al
Filing
97
ORDER granting 96 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The extension request above is approved. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/19/2021) (va)
Case 1:18-cv-04941-LAP Document 96 Filed 03/18/21 Page 1 of 2
TROY LAW, PLLC
ATTORNEYS / COUNSELORS AT LAW
Tel: (718) 762-1324 troylaw@troypllc.com Fax: (718) 762-1342
41-25 Kissena Boulevard, Suite 103, Flushing, NY 11355
March 18, 2021
Via ECF
Hon. Loretta A. Preska, U.S.D.J.
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
Re:
Motion for Extension of Time to Move for Substitution of Cho Kam Sze
Ye v. 2953 Broadway LLC, No. 18-cv-4941 (LAP), (S.D.N.Y.)
Your Honor,
I represent the Plaintiffs in the above-referenced matter. I write respectfully to request an
extension of 45 days to move for the substitution of Defendant Cho Kam Sze a/k/a Tommy Sze
(hereinafter “Tommy Sze”) due to the continued pendency in the Queens County Surrogate’s Court
of a petition for administration of Tommy Sze’s estate. This would extend Plaintiffs’ time to move
from March 18, 2021 to May 2, 2021.
Tommy Sze died on October 6, 2020. On November 5, 2020, his son and distributee, Edwin
Qiang Xi Sze a/k/a Qiang Xi Sze a/k/a Edwin Sze (hereinafter “Edwin Sze”), through counsel Yi
Lin, filed a petition for letters of administration. Counsel for Plaintiffs learned of Tommy Sze’s
death on December 14, 2020, from his counsel (who is also counsel for 2953 Broadway Inc. d/b/a
Vine Sushi (hereinafter “Vine Sushi”)), and filed a suggestion of death upon the record on
December 18, 2020. Accordingly, the time for any party to move for substitution of Tommy Sze
is March 11, 2021. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Defense counsel provided Plaintiffs’ counsel with
a copy of Edwin Sze’s petition, obtained from Yi Lin, on December 25, 2020. A copy is attached
hereto.
Edwin Sze’s domicile was redacted from the copy of the petition we received, however, on
December 31, 2020, his attorney Yi Lin consented by email to accept service of Plaintiffs’ motion
for substitution on his behalf. A copy of the consent is attached hereto.
According to Mr. Lin, as of today the Surrogate’s Court has not provided Mr. Lin with
written notice of a case number. Accordingly, it is our belief that the Surrogate’s Court has only
begun processing Edwin Sze’s petition, if that. However, it is my understanding that ultimately,
the Surrogate’s Court will appoint him the administrator of Tommy Sze’s estate.
Therefore, Plaintiffs request that this Court extend the time for filing their motion for
substitution of Tommy Sze by Edwin Sze an additional 45 days. See Hybrid Capital Group, LLC
v. Padell, 17-cv-06343 (KPF), Dkt. No. 68 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2018) (granting 45-day extension
when petition for appointment of executor was still pending when motion for substitution under
Rule 25 was due).
Case 1:18-cv-04941-LAP Document 96 Filed 03/18/21 Page 2 of 2
Hon. Loretta A. Preska, U.S.D.J.
March 18, 2021
Ye v. 2953 Broadway LLC, No. 18-cv-4941 (LAP), (S.D.N.Y.)
Page 2 of 2
I thank the Court for its attention to and consideration of this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
TROY LAW, PLLC
/s/ John Troy
John Troy
Attorney for Plaintiffs
cc: via ECF
all counsel of record
The extension request above is approved.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 19, 2021
New York, New York
_______________________________
_______________________________
_
LORETTA A. PRESKA, U.S.D.J.
A PRESKA U S D J
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?