Geigtech East Bay LLC v. Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.

Filing 182

ORDER terminating 176 Motion for Discovery. In light of the parties' representation that the discovery dispute raised at ECF No. 176 is resolved, the discovery conference previously scheduled on August 25, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. is adjourned sine die. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion at ECF No. 176. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 8/24/2022) (kv)

Case 1:18-cv-05290-CM-KHP Document 182
180 Filed 08/24/22
08/23/22 Page 1 of 2
901 Main Street, Suite 4120
Dallas, TX 75202
469-557-9390 469-533-1587 fax
—
New Jersey
—
New York
—
Delaware
—
Maryland
—
Florida

8/24/2022
Brian L. King
Member
Admitted in TX
Reply to Texas Office
Writer’s Direct Line: 469.557.9399
Writer’s Direct Fax: [phone]
Writer’s E-Mail: [e-mail]

August 23, 2022
In light of the parties' representation that the discovery dispute
VIA ECF
raised at ECF No. 176 is resolved, the discovery conference
Hon. Kathleen Parker
previously scheduled on August 25, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. is
U.S. District Court
adjourned sine die. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully
Southern District of New York
Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouserequested to terminate the motion at ECF No. 176.
500 Pearl Street, Room 24A
New York, NY 10007-1312
Re:

GeigTech East Pay LLC v. Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.
No. 1:18-cv-05290-CM

Dear Judge Parker:
Plaintiff GeigTech East Bay, LLC (“GeigTech”) submits this letter in response to
Defendant Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.’s (“Lutron”) request for a protective order concerning
upcoming depositions (Dkt. No. 176). GeigTech submits this letter with the approval and consent
of Lutron.
The parties have continued to meet and confer regarding this dispute and have been able to
reach an agreement. Under this agreement, the parties will agree to exchange 30(b)(6) topics by
Friday, August 26, 2022 so that factual depositions can be combined with the 30(b)(6) depositions
as necessary. In such cases, the parties agree that they will work together to provide additional
time when appropriate to conduct the combined depositions.
Based on this agreement, the parties no longer believe the discovery conference scheduled
for 2 PM ET on August 25, 2022 is necessary. To the extent the Court feels the scheduled
conference is still necessary, the parties request that out of town counsel be allowed to participate
via telephone.

www.coleschotz.com

8/24/2022

Case 1:18-cv-05290-CM-KHP Document 182
180 Filed 08/24/22
08/23/22 Page 2 of 2
Cole Schotz P.C.

Hon. Kathleen Parker
August 23, 2022
Page 2
The parties appreciate the time and attention the Court’s has given this matter.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Brian L. King
Brian L. King
BLK:gca
cc:

Counsel for Defendant