Qiu et al v. Shanghai Cuisine, Inc. et al
Filing
137
ORDER: On March 18, 2022, Plaintiffs informed the Court of the tragic passing of counsel for defendants Chenwen Ho and Na Sun. Doc. 136. Plaintiffs are hereby directed to serve the attached order on defendants' counsel's law firm. Def endants Ho and Sun are directed to inform the Court by April 15, 2022 as to whether they intend to be represented by another attorney from the same law firm through pro hac vice admission, seek new counsel, or proceed in this matter pro se. If proceeding pro se, Ho and Sun are directed to update the Court with their contact information. For assistance, Ho and Sun may call the Court's Pro Se Intake Unit at 212-805-0175. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/18/2022) (vfr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
TING QIU QIU, JIAN WEI DENG, YU BO SU,
ZHAOBANG BAI, and SHAOHONG ZENG,
Plaintiffs,
– against –
NA SUN, UNITED RESTAURANT GROUP,
INC., CHENWEN HO, SHANGHAI CUISINE,
INC., R & M CENTURY, INC., JIJIE HONG,
WING JING LAU, and JOSEPHINE FENG,
Defendants.
ORDER
18 Civ. 5448 (ER)
RAMOS, D.J.:
On March 18, 2022, Plaintiffs informed the Court of the tragic passing of counsel for
defendants Chenwen Ho and Na Sun. Doc. 136. Plaintiffs are hereby directed to serve the
attached order on defendants’ counsel’s law firm.
Defendants Ho and Sun are directed to inform the Court by April 15, 2022 as to
whether they intend to be represented by another attorney from the same law firm through
pro hac vice admission, seek new counsel, or proceed in this matter pro se. If proceeding pro
se, Ho and Sun are directed to update the Court with their contact information. For
assistance, Ho and Sun may call the Court’s Pro Se Intake Unit at 212-805-0175.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 18, 2022
New York, New York
Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?