Xochimitl Oropeza et al v. John Doe Corp. et al

Filing 42

DEFAULT JUDGMENT: On June 25, 2018, this action was commenced by Plaintiffs' filing of the complaint. (Dkt. No. 1). The summons and complaint in this action having been duly served on defendants John Doe Corp. (d/b/a New Star Coffee Sh op and Deli), Derek Pratt, Carmen Roman and Cirilo Roman (a.k.a. Cirolo) and said Defendants having failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action, and said default having been duly noted, and upon the annexed declaration of default ju dgment, NOW, on motion of Plaintiff, by his attorneys Michael Faillace & Associates, P.C., it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That the Plaintiffs have judgment against Defendants John Doe Corp. (d/b/a New Star Coffee Shop and Deli), Derek Pratt, Carmen Roman and Cirilo Roman (a.k.a. Cirolo), in the amount of $212,153.88, including compensatory damages and permissible liquidated damages and prejudgment interest, plus post judgment interest as provided in 28 U.S.C. § ; 1961(a). That the Plaintiffs are awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $1,750.00. That if any amounts remain unpaid upon the expiration of ninety days following issuance of judgment, or ninety days after expiration of the time to appeal and no appeal is then pending, whichever is later, the total amount of judgement shall automatically increase by fifteen percent, as required by NYLL § 198(4). (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/30/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (mro) Modified on 7/30/2020 (mro).

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-05747-ER Document 42 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------X MARTIN XOCHIMITL OROPEZA, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 18-CV-05747-ER -againstPROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT JOHN DOE CORP. (D/B/A NEW STAR COFFEE SHOP AND DELI), DEREK PRATT, CARMEN ROMAN, and CIRILO ROMAN (A.K.A. CIROLO), Defendants -------------------------------------------------------X JUDGMENT On June 25, 2018, this action was commenced by Plaintiffs’ filing of the complaint. (Dkt. No. 1). The summons and complaint in this action having been duly served on defendants John Doe Corp. (d/b/a New Star Coffee Shop and Deli), Derek Pratt, Carmen Roman and Cirilo Roman (a.k.a. Cirolo) and said Defendants having failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action, and said default having been duly noted, and upon the annexed declaration of default judgment, NOW, on motion of Plaintiff, by his attorneys Michael Faillace & Associates, P.C., it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That the Plaintiffs have judgment against Defendants John Doe Corp. (d/b/a New Star Coffee Shop and Deli), Derek Pratt, Carmen Roman and Cirilo Roman (a.k.a. Cirolo), in the amount of $212,153.88, including compensatory damages and permissible liquidated damages and prejudgment interest, plus post judgment interest as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). That the Plaintiffs are awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1,750.00. Case 1:18-cv-05747-ER Document 42 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 2 That if any amounts remain unpaid upon the expiration of ninety days following issuance of judgment, or ninety days after expiration of the time to appeal and no appeal is then pending, whichever is later, the total amount of judgement shall automatically increase by fifteen percent, as required by NYLL § 198(4). Dated: New York, New York July 30 ISSUED: _____________, 2020 ____________________________________________ HONORABLE EDGARDO RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE To: John Doe Corp. d/b/a New Star Coffee Shop and Deli 3150 Bainbridge Avenue, Bronx, NY 10467 Derek Pratt c/o New Star Coffee Shop and Deli 3150 Bainbridge Avenue, Bronx, NY 10467 Carmen Roman c/o New Star Coffee Shop and Deli 3150 Bainbridge Avenue, Bronx, NY 10467 Cirilo Roman (a.k.a. Cirolo) c/o New Star Coffee Shop and Deli 3150 Bainbridge Avenue, Bronx, NY 10467 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?