Antonetti v. United States of America

Filing 10

ORDER: Therefore, it is Ordered that: The Court appoints CJA counsel on duty August 10, 2020, David A. Ruhnke, for the purpose of advising Petitioner in advance of and during resentencing. The parties shall appear for a hearing on Octobe r 20, 2020, at which time the Government will consent to the vacatur of the § 924(c) charge and the Court will resentence Petitioner on the remaining counts of conviction. A Supplemental Presentence Investigation Report is due to the Court o n October 6, 2020. Any sentencing submissions by Petitioner must be made by October 12, 2020, and must state specifically whether Petitioner contests any fact in the Supplemental Pre-sentence Investigation Report, and whether Petitioner contests the appropriateness of the Probation Officer's Sentencing Recommendation. Probation should contact Chambers if they experience difficulty in scheduling the pre-sentence interview, or if the Supplemental PSR will not be completed in a timely fashion. Any response or other submission from the Government is due October 16, 2020. SO ORDERED. Attorney David Arthur Ruhnke for Jose Antonetti added. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 8/10/2020) (va)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-07239-KMW Document 10 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------X USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: __________________ DATE FILED: August 10, 2020 JOSE ANTONETTI, Petitioner, 02-CR-1232 (KMW) 18-CV-7239 (KMW) -against- ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------X KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge: On October 29, 2003, Petitioner Jose Antonetti pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and one count of brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), predicated on one of the Hobbs Act conspiracy charges. Petitioner was sentenced to 77 months’ imprisonment on the Hobbs Act conspiracies and 84 months’ imprisonment on the § 924(c) charge, to be served consecutively. Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (ECF No. 47 1.) On September 30, 2019, Petitioner filed a supplemental brief, in which he argued that his conviction on the § 924(c) charge could not stand under the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). (ECF No. 59.) On August 3, 2020, the Government informed the Court that it agrees with Petitioner that his conviction on the § 924(c) charge is invalid under Davis. (ECF No. 62.) Therefore, it is Ordered that: 1 All references to Petitioner’s electronic docket refer to Petitioner’s criminal docket. Case 1:18-cv-07239-KMW Document 10 Filed 08/10/20 Page 2 of 2 The Court appoints CJA counsel on duty August 10, 2020, David A. Ruhnke, for the purpose of advising Petitioner in advance of and during resentencing. The parties shall appear for a hearing on October 20, 2020, at which time the Government will consent to the vacatur of the § 924(c) charge and the Court will resentence Petitioner on the remaining counts of conviction. A Supplemental Presentence Investigation Report is due to the Court on October 6, 2020. Any sentencing submissions by Petitioner must be made by October 12, 2020, and must state specifically whether Petitioner contests any fact in the Supplemental Presentence Investigation Report, and whether Petitioner contests the appropriateness of the Probation Officer’s Sentencing Recommendation. Probation should contact Chambers if they experience difficulty in scheduling the presentence interview, or if the Supplemental PSR will not be completed in a timely fashion. Any response or other submission from the Government is due October 16, 2020. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York August 10, 2020 /s/ Kimba M. Wood KIMBA M. WOOD United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?