Hong v. Aigle et al

Filing 82

AMENDED TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER granting 81 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference; granting 81 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' request at ECF No. 81 is GRANTED, and the Court orders as follows: 1. By August 5, 2022, Defendants' substitute counsel shall file a notice of appearance; 2. By September 7, 2022, Defendants shall file their reply in further support of their motion to quash (ECF No. 73); and 3. The telephone conference scheduled for August 12, 2022 at 4:00 pm is ADJOURNED to Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 11:00 am on the Court's conference line. The parties are directed to call: (866) 390-1828; access code: 380-9799, at the scheduled time. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 81. SO ORDERED. ( Telephone Conference set for 9/13/2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 7/29/22) (yv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRANDON HONG, Plaintiff, -v- CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18 Civ. 8110 (VSB) (SLC) C.O. AIGLE and SECURITY CAPTAIN GRAHAM, AMENDED TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER Defendant. SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants’ request at ECF No. 81 is GRANTED, and the Court orders as follows: 1. By August 5, 2022, Defendants’ substitute counsel shall file a notice of appearance; 2. By September 7, 2022, Defendants shall file their reply in further support of their motion to quash (ECF No. 73); and 3. The telephone conference scheduled for August 12, 2022 at 4:00 pm is ADJOUNED to Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 11:00 am on the Court’s conference line. The parties are directed to call: (866) 390-1828; access code: 380-9799, at the scheduled time. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 81. Dated: New York, New York July 29, 2022 SO ORDERED. _________________________ SARAH L. CAVE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?