Ng v. Kmart Pharmacy et al

Filing 26

ORDER: On January 12, 2023, the parties stipulated and agreed that this action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice "as to the defendants, KMART PHARMACY, KMART HOLDING CORPORATION, and SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION only." ECF No. 25 (em phasis added). The parties did not dismiss the action as it related to SEDGWICK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. After the parties entered the stipulation and agreement, the Clerk of Court inadvertently terminated the case. The Clerk of Court respectfu lly is requested to reopen the case and terminate all defendants except SEDGWICK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Case reopened. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 1/17/2023) (tg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-09373-MKV-BCM Document 26 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/17/2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIAN COKE NG, Plaintiff, 1:18-cv-9373-MKV -against- ORDER KMART PHARMACY, et al., Defendants. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: On January 12, 2023, the parties stipulated and agreed that this action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice “as to the defendants, KMART PHARMACY, KMART HOLDING CORPORATION, and SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION only.” ECF No. 25 (emphasis added). The parties did not dismiss the action as it related to SEDGWICK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. After the parties entered the stipulation and agreement, the Clerk of Court inadvertently terminated the case. The Clerk of Court respectfully is requested to reopen the case and terminate all defendants except SEDGWICK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Date: January 17, 2023 New York, NY _________________________________ MARY KAY VYSKOCIL United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?