Dass v. The City University of New York et al
Filing
131
ORDER: The Court spent an inordinate amount of time combing through the minutiae of the parties' document discovery disputes, even after numerous in-person and telephonic conferences concerning the breadth and scope of Plaintiff's reque sted discovery. The majority of these requests sought discovery that was not proportional to the needs of the case. If the parties continue to require Court intervention at this level to resolve their voluminous discovery disputes, the Court may e nter an Order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5) requiring expenses paid for failures to make disclosures or cooperate in discovery. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)(C) ("If the motion is g r anted in part in part and denied in part, the court may is sue an protective order authorized under Rule 26(c) and may, after giving an opportunity to be heard, apportion the reasonable expenses for the motion"). For the requests for which limited production or review was directed, Defendants shall make rolling productions and must complete productions by June 6, 2022. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 5/10/2022) (rro)
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------x
KRISHNA DASS,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-against:
:
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
-------------------------------------------------------------x
No. 18-CV-11325 (VSB) (OTW)
ORDER
ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:
The Court has reviewed ECF 129 and 129-4 (Exhibit D of the parties’ 5/6/22 Joint
Agenda) and construes those submissions as Plaintiff’s request to compel compliance with her
post-deposition document demands. The Court’s rulings on the 39 individual document
demands still in dispute are indicated in the attached Exhibit A, which is an annotated version
of ECF 129-4.
The Court spent an inordinate amount of time combing through the minutiae of the
parties’ document discovery disputes, even after numerous in-person and telephonic
conferences concerning the breadth and scope of Plaintiff’s requested discovery. The majority
of these requests sought discovery that was not proportional to the needs of the case. If the
parties continue to require Court intervention at this level to resolve their voluminous discovery
disputes, the Court may enter an Order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5) requiring expenses paid
for failures to make disclosures or cooperate in discovery. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)(C) (“If the
motion is granted in part in part and denied in part, the court may issue an protective order
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 16
authorized under Rule 26(c) and may, after giving an opportunity to be heard, apportion the
reasonable expenses for the motion”).
For the requests for which limited production or review was directed, Defendants shall
make rolling productions and must complete productions by June 6, 2022.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 10, 2022
New York, New York
s/ Ona T. Wang
Ona T. Wang
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 131 Filed 05/10/22 Page 16 of 16
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?