Dass v. The City University of New York et al
Filing
134
ORDER: The Court has reviewed ECF 129 and rules on Section III of that document and Ex. E, ECF 129-5 as follows: Plaintiff's request for in camera review is denied. Documents labeled Priv0012, 0013, 0014, 0035, 0037 are protected by attor ney-client privilege and/or work product protection and these documents need not be produced. The disputes concerning Priv0034, 0036 and DEF_Dass_E0000372 appear to have been resolved (See ECF 129-5). The dispute concerning Priv0086 also appea rs to have been resolved, and the parties are meeting and conferring regarding the "waiting list" referenced in ECF 129 Section IV and note 2. As part of their meet and confer process, Defendants are directed to inquire and disclose to Plaintiff whether any versions, native or otherwise, still exist of the "waiting list" dating from 2015-2016. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 5/10/2022) (rro)
<![CDATA[
Case 1:18-cv-11325-VSB-OTW Document 134 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------x
KRISHNA DASS,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-against:
:
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
-------------------------------------------------------------x
No. 18-CV-11325 (VSB) (OTW)
ORDER
ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:
The Court has reviewed ECF 129 and rules on Section III of that document and Ex. E, ECF
129-5 as follows:
•
Plaintiff’s request for in camera review is denied. Documents labeled Priv0012,
0013, 0014, 0035, 0037 are protected by attorney-client privilege and/or work
product protection and these documents need not be produced.
•
The disputes concerning Priv0034, 0036 and DEF_Dass_E0000372 appear to have
been resolved (See ECF 129-5).
•
The dispute concerning Priv0086 also appears to have been resolved, and the parties
are meeting and conferring regarding the “waiting list” referenced in ECF 129
Section IV and note 2. As part of their meet and confer process, Defendants are
directed to inquire and disclose to Plaintiff whether any versions, native or
otherwise, still exist of the “waiting list” dating from 2015-2016.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 10, 2022
New York, New York
s/ Ona T. Wang
Ona T. Wang
United States Magistrate Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
