In Re: Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis or M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis with Kinectiv Technology and Versys Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation

Filing 191

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 190 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Zimmer MDL Defendants against Tamma Nutting. It is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 6, 2021, Zimmer' ;s motion to exclude Truman's testimony is GRANTED, and Zimmer's summary judgment on Nutting's claims of design defect, failure to warn, and negligence is GRANTED. The remaining motions to exclude expert testimony are denied as moot; accordingly, case number 19cv699 is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 8/23/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-mc-02859-PAC Document 191 Filed 08/23/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X IN RE: ZIMMER M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS OR M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS WITH KINECTIV TECHNOLOGY AND VERSYS FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. : ! ) "'\ ,' ', .' ' ;: ' ~ [ _,• \ ./ < \ : i . ,' I , ; ;~ L' I " I . 1 ) J . ·~ i ~ f ' )•. ! :, ( ·., \. '.'' : .• i y, ! l I • \; ( ·, \ ~ I, ; f T \.' 1 .' ; i , ,! 3 I !:; ' l i , l_ ' TAMMA NUTTING, Plaintiff, 18 MD 2859 (PAC) 18 MC 2859 (PAC) 19 CIVIL 699 (PAC) JUDGMENT -against- ZIMMER, INC., et al., Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------X It is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 6, 2021, Zimmer's motion to exclude Truman's testimony is GRANTED, and Zimmer's summary judgment on Nutting's claims of design defect, failure to warn, and negligence is GRANTED. The remaining motions to exclude expert testimony are denied as moot; accordingly, case number 19cv699 is closed. Dated: New York, New York August 23, 2021 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: Deputy Clerk 1 • -·

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?