In Re: Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis or M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis with Kinectiv Technology and Versys Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation
Filing
191
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 190 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Zimmer MDL Defendants against Tamma Nutting. It is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 6, 2021, Zimmer' ;s motion to exclude Truman's testimony is GRANTED, and Zimmer's summary judgment on Nutting's claims of design defect, failure to warn, and negligence is GRANTED. The remaining motions to exclude expert testimony are denied as moot; accordingly, case number 19cv699 is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 8/23/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
Case 1:18-mc-02859-PAC Document 191 Filed 08/23/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------X
IN RE: ZIMMER M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS
OR M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS WITH
KINECTIV TECHNOLOGY AND VERSYS
FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION.
: ! ) "'\ ,' ', .' ' ;:
' ~
[ _,• \ ./ < \
: i .
,'
I
,
;
;~
L' I " I . 1 )
J . ·~
i
~
f
'
)•.
! :,
(
·., \.
'.''
: .•
i
y, ! l
I
•
\;
( ·, \
~ I,
;
f
T \.' 1 .' ;
i ,
,!
3
I
!:; '
l i , l_ '
TAMMA NUTTING,
Plaintiff,
18 MD 2859 (PAC)
18 MC 2859 (PAC)
19 CIVIL 699 (PAC)
JUDGMENT
-against-
ZIMMER, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------X
It is,
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
That for the reasons stated
in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 6, 2021, Zimmer's motion to exclude Truman's
testimony is GRANTED, and Zimmer's summary judgment on Nutting's claims of design defect,
failure to warn, and negligence is GRANTED. The remaining motions to exclude expert testimony
are denied as moot; accordingly, case number 19cv699 is closed.
Dated: New York, New York
August 23, 2021
RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court
BY:
Deputy Clerk
1
•
-·
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?