Callas et al v. S&P Global Inc.

Filing 80

ORDER granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted, and the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion (Dkt. No. 60). The reasons for the Court's decision will be explained in more detail in a forthcoming opinion. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 3/31/2021) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WILLIAM CALLAS, THOMAS CASSESE, and NATALIE FERD, Plaintiffs, ORDER -against19 Civ. 1478 (PGG) S&P GLOBAL INC., Defendant. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: On April 10, 2020, Defendant S&P Global Inc. moved for summary judgment in this ERISA action alleging that Plaintiffs were improperly denied severance benefits. (Dkt. No. 60) The Court concludes that Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that the decisions denying their benefit claims were arbitrary and capricious. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion (Dkt. No. 60). The reasons for the Court’s decision will be explained in more detail in a forthcoming opinion. Dated: New York, New York March 31, 2021

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?