SPIN MASTER LTD. and SPIN MASTER, INC. v. ALVY, et al.
Filing
148
ORDER for 144 Report and Recommendations,,, It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Report is ADOPTED in part. Plaintiffs are awarded damages in the amount of $50,000.00 against each of the following Defaulting Defendants: Atrigger, bason888, BokenUS, Catchmaik, Cenda, Cymely, Dadiii, DLUCKY, EASERELAX, fengheshun, Fshgh, GlobalCareMarket, LittiL, LTINTIN, NOVOTE, Piei Jkiews, plusA, RUNFON, SANOHAMI, SEENDOM, supergogo, Torero X, twistymagicalpetz, UKCG, Xiaohuoji, Yaoguan, Yardom, Yungcong.15 and Zhanhong. If delinquent, Defendants shall pay post-judgment ORDERED that, if Plaintiffs seek damages from Defendant DIYurfeeling, Plaintiffs shall file an additional certificate of service by January 24, 2022. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/10/2022) (ks)
Case 1:19-cv-03452-LGS-BCM Document 148 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
SPIN MASTER LTD., et al.,
:
Plaintiffs,
:
-against:
:
ALVY, et al.,
:
:
Defendant. :
------------------------------------------------------------- X
19 Civ. 3452 (LGS)
ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
WHEREAS, by the Final Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order dated October
11, 2019, Plaintiffs were granted judgment against the Defaulting Defendants (Dkt. No. 119), 1 and
on January 10, 2020, Plaintiffs’ request for damages was referred to Magistrate Judge Barbara C.
Moses for a post-default judgment inquest (Dkt. No. 127);
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2021, Judge Moses issued a Report and Recommendation
(the “Report”) recommending that Plaintiffs be awarded damages in the amount of $50,000 against
each of the following Defaulting Defendants: Atrigger, bason888, BokenUS, Catchmaik, Cenda,
Cymely, Dadiii, DIYurfeeling, DLUCKY, EASERELAX, fengheshun, Fshgh, GlobalCareMarket,
LittiL, LTINTIN, NOVOTE, Piei Jkiews, plusA, RUNFON, SANOHAMI, SEENDOM, supergogo,
Torero X, twistymagicalpetz, UKCG, Xiaohuoji, Yaoguan, Yardom, Yungcong.15 and Zhanhong
Direct (Dkt. No. 144); 2
1
The Final Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order defines the Defaulting Defendants
as Amyuns, Atrigger, bason888, BokenUS, Catchmaik, Cenda, Cymely, Dadiii, dicesnow,
DIYurfeeling, DLUCKY, EASERELAX, fengheshun, Fshgh, GlobalCareMarket, imixlot, kecooi,
LittiL, LTINTIN, NOVOTE, Oliote, Piei Jkiews, plusA, RUNFON, SANOHAMI, SEENDOM,
supergogo, Torero X, twistymagicalpetz, UKCG, Womdee- Direct, Xiaohuoji, Yaoguan, Yardom,
Yuncong.15 and Zhanhong Direct. (Dkt. No. 119 at 2.)
2
Following the Court’s Final Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order, Plaintiffs
voluntarily dismissed claims against a number of Defaulting Defendants. (Dkt. Nos. 121, 133,
137.)
Case 1:19-cv-03452-LGS-BCM Document 148 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, as stated in the Report, the deadline for any objections was fourteen days from
service of the Report;
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Certificate of Service stating, “[o]n
November 17, 2021, pursuant to the methods of alternative service authorized by the TRO and PI
Order, Plaintiffs served a copy of the Report and Recommendation on each and every Defaulting
Defendant, except Defendant DIYurfeeling” (Dkt. No. 147);
WHEREAS, no objections were timely filed by the Defaulting Defendants who have been
served with a copy of the Report;
WHEREAS, in reviewing a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, a District Judge
“may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the
magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). A district judge is required to “determine de novo
any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to” by any party. Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Romano, 794 F.3d 317, 340 (2d Cir. 2015). “To invoke de novo
review of the magistrate judge’s recommendations, a party’s objections must be specific and clearly
aimed at particular findings in the magistrate judge’s proposal.” McDonaugh v. Astrue, 672 F. Supp.
2d 542, 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). “When a party makes only
conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates his original arguments, the court reviews the
report and recommendation strictly for clear error.” Piligian v. Icahn Sch. of Med. at Mount Sinai,
490 F. Supp. 3d 707, 715 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (internal quotation marks omitted);
WHEREAS, the Court finds no clear error on the face of the record as to the
recommendation of damages. It is hereby
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Report is ADOPTED in part. Plaintiffs are awarded
damages in the amount of $50,000.00 against each of the following Defaulting Defendants:
Atrigger, bason888, BokenUS, Catchmaik, Cenda, Cymely, Dadiii, DLUCKY, EASERELAX,
2
Case 1:19-cv-03452-LGS-BCM Document 148 Filed 01/10/22 Page 3 of 3
fengheshun, Fshgh, GlobalCareMarket, LittiL, LTINTIN, NOVOTE, Piei Jkiews, plusA,
RUNFON, SANOHAMI, SEENDOM, supergogo, Torero X, twistymagicalpetz, UKCG, Xiaohuoji,
Yaoguan, Yardom, Yungcong.15 and Zhanhong. If delinquent, Defendants shall pay post-judgment
interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. It is further
ORDERED that, if Plaintiffs seek damages from Defendant DIYurfeeling, Plaintiffs shall
file an additional certificate of service by January 24, 2022.
Dated: January 10, 2022
New York, New York
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?