Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v. Best Brands Consumer Products, Inc. et al

Filing 125

ORDER: On December 11, 2020, the Court granted in part Defendants Best Brands Consumer Products, Inc. and Best Brands Sales Company, LLC's (together, "Defendants'") motion for sanctions. Dkt. No. 124. In its orde r, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay for the supplemental discovery and Defendants' reasonable attorney's fees and costs that resulted from Plaintiff's failure to meet its discovery obligations. Id. To streamline that process, the Court orders the parties to confer and jointly propose dates, by no later than December 21, 2020, for the following: a schedule for the parties to conduct the supplemental discovery described in the Court's December 11, 2020 o rder; a teleconference during which the parties and the Court will discuss the proposed schedule and the best way to proceed with discovery; and a briefing schedule for Defendants' anticipated motion for the attorney's fees and costs they have already incurred. Plaintiff is directed to serve this order on GennComm and to retain proof of service. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/14/2020) (mro)

Case 1:19-cv-03766-GHW Document 125 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------X
BEVERLY HILLS TEDDY BEAR COMPANY, :
:
Plaintiff, :
:
-against:
:
BEST BRANDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC, :
BEST BRANDS SALES COMPANY, LLC, and
:
GENNCOMM, LLC,
:
:
Defendants. :
----------------------------------------------------------------- X

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 12/14/2020

1:19-cv-3766-GHW
ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:
On December 11, 2020, the Court granted in part Defendants Best Brands Consumer
Products, Inc. and Best Brands Sales Company, LLC’s (together, “Defendants’”) motion for
sanctions. Dkt. No. 124. In its order, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay for the supplemental
discovery and Defendants’ reasonable attorney’s fees and costs that resulted from Plaintiff’s failure
to meet its discovery obligations. Id. To streamline that process, the Court orders the parties to
confer and jointly propose dates, by no later than December 21, 2020, for the following:
•

a schedule for the parties to conduct the supplemental discovery described in the
Court’s December 11, 2020 order;

•

a teleconference during which the parties and the Court will discuss the proposed
schedule and the best way to proceed with discovery; and

•

a briefing schedule for Defendants’ anticipated motion for the attorney’s fees and
costs they have already incurred.

Plaintiff is directed to serve this order on GennComm and to retain proof of service.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 14, 2020

_____________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge