KLS Diversified Master Fund, L.P. v. McDevitt

Filing 99

ORDER denying 97 Letter Motion to Compel. The Court construes Defendant's request as a thinly-veiled motion for reconsideration. It is denied. Defendant does not raise any issues he could not have raised earlier or that the Court did not consider in its prior opinions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 4/7/2021) (va)

ÿ
ÿ

13578
ÿÿ26 ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿÿ
2ÿ6ÿ9

ÿÿ
6



 
!#  ÿÿ '
ÿ  ÿÿ ÿ 5
$%& ()ÿ

"

: <>? ;<B>Dÿ
;=@ ÿÿ C=E
A/
F<Gÿ=11ÿ 23ÿ
= "ÿIJ 2
FH 5
 =(
$N$%& ()ÿ
K"$LM  '
ÿ
<!<?ÿ
ÿ ÿ2


OPRUÿXY
QSV Wÿ
ÿW
Z[ ^_^`abcd[ e[ dfÿ
\ÿ
`ÿ _[
ÿ
ghj mRÿj pqÿ
iÿ noÿ i
kl kR
ÿ
ristuqlÿ nQwÿ ys
R ÿssnvRsRs Qÿ
l
xh
uyzQÿ nQwÿ{ mÿ Qÿ
hslivRsRs ÿ }h~
h |l
X€qS sls
XÿlQÿ Qlÿ
u
hpÿXÿ
h ‚Y
|l }h~ÿ }jXXÿ
mÿ QV ÿ X‚
|j Y
ÿ
ÿ
lÿ „_…†‡‰‹Œ‰ÿ ‹‰ÿ ’“ •”” †‰‡ÿ
ƒ ÿ ˆŠ‡‡ŽŠe‘ ÿ ÿÿ ˆ
_” ˆŽ– 
ÿ —yÿ Riƒ uqÿ vlRÿ
Q ls
xS ÿ li˜w ™s
s
ÿ vh~s j YY›™X‚
wlÿ ƒ ƒšw›œ‚ÿ
|hÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
vlQyžÿ pqƒ
qÿ tlkR iÿ
o
ŸlqlRÿllPÿ{ yÿ RRiqt—QlV qlÿ QSWÿXYÿlh™iÿSRs{nphRi
ÿQÿiQwRshÿhQ—Pihÿiÿ tQtstOPR V WV nSRž€qiR¡ÿ s ÿ
ÿ
ÿW Q
{ h
h
{Qnppq ¢tplshÿzÿphiÿ{tpqlVRwyRžqsQlnÿlnqtwnn£zÿ
hÿy Qÿyž iÿislq yshÿq žnÿiStiÿs i ¡{lÿiÿhsÿsl
¤ tQ¦ÿ ÿShq~h lžÿ yÿ iQnRnQwRiÿisl—QlVtQwRž€qiR{sÿ
—Ql¥jŸlqnÿwimStl}hQghh¡ÿisys nRÿzÿ tQ Rls ÿSRs ÿh
ÿ
h
ÿ i {
n§ sqPhhlÿyž iÿiqwQqwÿ sÿzÿ tQhÿQ§{Qÿ QS‚ÿXYÿ{lÿ
ypR ÿQPnt¢tplsRÿwhtilmR sl—QlV ihÿlhlOPR VWWVqsQ
ÿ
z
ÿ
ÿ
S
¢
ÿ z
{
ml

mzwÿ yÿ iQmRÿilÿÿRqÿ tplsÿhÿ lQqhnnshsÿlh ÿ ÿlPw{Sÿ
Rz}hQghhÿ SlsQq{iSyž ij¨Qs ÿlniÿlÿ Qz§SmV QnlsyS
Q©ls ¬ÿqÿhPQyRÿsÿQnht h SRs{n QPnt yž iÿq ys iÿ«¬ÿ
lynÿ«­ i Phsis h lPiÿsÿ€qiR¡ÿPhhlÿ¢tpls phiÿqt ¬

{
­
h
{
twplss i{h €qiR{QžQRžslPhltÿQpÿzÿqlhÿiÿ{uil¡ÿnlnÿ
hy iqR ÿQpÿSRs ÿlqtiÿzÿQwln{h slnSÿ{q hÿlnRnqnsV
gh l z R ¢
ÿ
§{Qÿ yÿ iQilnsl{iSyž ij
lhl}hQ hÿ sQÿ ÿ qÿtpls
Onnqlÿi}hQghh¡ÿ tQqtRÿwhtilmR ÿls išUtÿ{sl|l }h~
ÿsstRÿ yÿ iQn—QlV iÿiqwQqwÿ s uwR ÿ›Y£¦hÿzÿ mÿ Qÿ
ÿ
z h
ri{Q xh QRSxhlÿ®¯ÿ ÿqÿywn{SÿhtslxhSsQSsllRÿhtnyl
Rhpÿ pplwqÿ tV¤R{°kuztnwlnyS nSÿzÿ S lqVzQÿniÿRPsÿ

q ÿ
sqÿzÿQwln{h sqÿqlRÿlSlÿ °kumhSÿlh{lÿžRnÿzÿphin°ku
zsslPhltÿQpÿzsnSÿ{QqR t§ÿ ÿ yt§ÿ{nsqqisslq ysÿ ÿ
±
mhSÿllsStsÿll™ÿQpÿ vlRÿilÿ l¢tplsÿ²³vh~s jUÿjXÿi
yt§ÿiRlÿ QwRl{h ˜w ™sytQs ÿ ž ijÿ³ÿ wlÿ ÿ V ÿ j ÿ
s h
s zy ¥
|hš PY ´
nPhs {Rÿq žnphRiV SRs{znhSÿ{llÿzÿ{RqRhÿ wqS QRRmzÿ
yPQÿ ÿntpqlÿ s nÿ qiRÿqÿi h{Qtslq{t™s {˜Rzlÿ QSV h
hs
h € {
ÿ
µq Sÿ
S{ÿ ÿÿy WWVhnPhssÿnlsisqÿluilÿhSsQSqÿhVnhÿ QSXYÿ
ls RoSÿXXÿÿyPQÿnqnQR ÿ szÿlnR S lqÿ nisqÿ{OPRWWV
°ku i
s
R hzs
wq z ÿ
ÿ
§lÿhtÿ yzqÿ{RqRwlQ SwnslPQhqÿimStlyhÿ RznwÿiqnQRi
linSju wÿiq{t™sSqSÿ ~ÿ ÿlniS h lžÿPimzwÿyzqÿnls ÿ
ÿ
ÿ q z
~
h
wi§ÿqlVRwÿ j QRRmhSÿqliÿRls~h lžÿlqtiÿzÿ nÿPs›ql
qÿl§ntÿil˜QµqQSÿ ytz™ÿhtQwÿimStlQžQRžslphsy›htsÿ
n ÿ S
pqilqwVRPns iÿqtRžÿi¶QqlhÿlnRnwSsQS
RsiilÿnhRhV iS V thÿ Sÿ{ il¡ÿhSlqj
t R z iq n u
q ÿ
*++,ÿÿ013ÿÿ 551 .78 5ÿ
./ 2 .34 56ÿÿ409

ÿ
12ÿ6ÿ 
ÿ
3 79


58 ÿ
6ÿ
37 ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
8
ÿ
ÿ
)ÿ6+ÿ-,8
8ÿ ÿ82-7 ÿ821ÿ+,*6-
28ÿ*8,3ÿ-76*8ÿ
*7 ,
ÿ+ÿ./08318,27 348,,ÿ76, ÿ352ÿ*6/*
3
ÿ7 816

3
ÿ
1,ÿ-32
8ÿ2
 *75*ÿ1-08ÿ7
1ÿ
-2ÿ-36 3 8/3 , *ÿ
181
8715 *ÿ6226
, 3 , -68 2*, 8ÿ1381ÿ82 5
2
ÿ
6-3 , *3360+,8ÿ2+1,ÿ8.8ÿ
5ÿ*ÿ8 2,ÿ878ÿ3*6-ÿ
*
76 ÿ85*ÿ 8+312ÿ181+/ÿ8*17 5, ÿ7
*136 5.ÿ76, 

 +
8
-ÿ
62ÿ
2 *6*+1*,8*
68ÿÿ8.ÿ76,2+5278,, ÿÿ
ÿ 8ÿ3/55,5,ÿ3*6

.

-ÿ
98,:326ÿ52ÿ
ÿ
32*686*
ÿ 6ÿ821*ÿ ÿ3ÿ/6.8,ÿ621ÿ
ÿ *ÿ
ÿ /*8-332ÿ
153, ÿ-,1348,50887 7ÿ 5121
+
*

+
ÿ


-3+3 ,ÿ7361ÿ855ÿ
2,8ÿ +7, ÿ1*88
06 ÿ 8
6*883ÿ
6237
ÿ
DD
911; <) ÿ 9@ÿ B?C<9ÿ ÿ
ÿ =>
6 >?99) Aÿ
ÿ
ÿ
B3ÿFF 31
+3 81*EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEÿ
1ÿ 6,8ÿ 26EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
E G+
6
<)
G>?DD?ÿ ÿ =C)

CB) 1ÿ
G>C)=1 Hÿ?I69@ÿ
6 >?Cÿ )
6
6
<??Cÿ19J6 ÿ
ÿ >?

ÿ
K M O K PRQ K SL Tÿ
L N N MQQ L KL L ÿ
The Court construes Defendant's request as a thinly-veiled motion for reconsideration. It is
denied. Defendant does not raise any issues he could nto have raised earlier or that the Court
did not consider in its prior opinions.
SO ORDERED. 4/7/2021.

ÿÿ ! "# $%ÿÿ#(
 "ÿÿ $$ &' $ÿ