Atkinson et al v. Mount Sinai Health System, Inc. et al

Filing 103

CLERK'S RULE 54(b) JUDGMENT re: #102 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Mount Sinai Health System, Inc., Bruno Silva, Dennis S. Charney, Prabhjot Singh against Holly Atkinson, Humale Khan, Mary Caliendo, Natasha Anushri Anandaraja. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 22, 2022, the Motion is GRANTED as it pertains to the Dismissed Plaintiffs' claims and DENIED as it pertains to Misiti's retaliation claims. Final judgment is entered pursuant to Rule 54(b) against the Dismissed Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendants.It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 22, 2022, the Motion is GRANTED as it pertains to the Dismissed Plaintiffs' claims and DENIED as it pertains to Misiti's retaliation claims. Final judgment is entered pursuant to Rule 54(b) against the Dismissed Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendants. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 4/25/2022) (Attachments: #1 Right to Appeal) (km)

Case 1:19-cv-03779-VSB-JW Document 103 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 1

l

:

I',,

. ,.

°:

i

'1-.

lr/'
,'

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------X
DR. HOLLY ATKINSON et al.,
Plaintiffs,
19 CIVIL 3779 (VSB)

-against-

CLERK'S RULE 54{b) JUDGMENT

DR. PRABHJOT SINGH et al.,
Defendants.

-----------------------------------------------------------X
It is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons

stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 22, 2022, the Motion is GRANTED as it
pertains to the Dismissed Plaintiffs' claims and DENIED as it pertains to Misiti's retaliation
claims. Final judgment is entered pursuant to Rule 54(b) against the Dismissed Plaintiffs and in
favor of Defendants.

Dated: New York, New York
April 25, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court

BY: