Gjenashaj et al v. City of New York et al

Filing 106

ORDER re: 98 Declaration in Opposition to Motion, filed by Lori Gjenashaj. For the reasons stated on the record during the parties telephonic oral argument on October 9, 2020, this Court directs the parties to re-submit these Exhibits with D efendants proposed redactions by October 19, 2020. This Court reminds Defendants that "the party asserting the law enforcement privilege bears the burden of showing that the privilege indeed applies to the documents atM issue." In re The City of New York, 607 F.3d 923, 948 (2d Cir. 2010). Accordingly, these Exhibits shall remain temporarily sealed until this Court reviews the proposed redactions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 10/14/2020) (kv)

Case 1:19-cv-04142-WHP-GWG Document 106 Filed 10/14/20 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

LORI GJENASHAJ,
Plaintiff,
-againstTHE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

19cv4142
ORDER

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior United States District Judge:
The parties move to seal Exhibits F, I, J, N, and O, (ECF Nos. 98-6, 98-9, 98-10,
98-14, and 98-15), of the Declaration of Edward Stone in Support of Plaintiff’s Counterstatement
to Defendant Lt. Harrison’s Rule 56.1 Statement and Statement of Additional Facts, (ECF No.
98). For the reasons stated on the record during the parties’ telephonic oral argument on October
9, 2020, this Court directs the parties to re-submit these Exhibits with Defendants’ proposed
redactions by October 19, 2020.
This Court reminds Defendants that “the party asserting the law enforcement
privilege bears the burden of showing that the privilege indeed applies to the documents at
issue.” In re The City of New York, 607 F.3d 923, 948 (2d Cir. 2010). Accordingly, these
Exhibits shall remain temporarily sealed until this Court reviews the proposed redactions.
Dated: October 14, 2020
New York, New York