Goolden v. Wardak

Filing 170

ORDER granting 141 Letter Motion to Seal. Accordingly, consistent with this Court's prior Order (ECF No. 134) sealing documents containing similar information, the transcript filed at ECF No. 135 shall remain under seal. Defendant is directed to file the redacted version of the transcript on the public docket in this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 141. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo on 9/15/2022) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-06257-ALC-VF Document 170 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X SARAH GOOLDEN 19-CV-6257(ALC) (VF) Plaintiff, ORDER -againstHAMED WARDAK, Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------X VALERIE FIGUEREDO, United States Magistrate Judge: On April 14, 2022, Defendant Hamed Wardak submitted a letter motion (ECF No. 141), asking to seal the transcript of the telephonic conference held before the Honorable Debra C. Freeman on March 15, 2022 (ECF No. 135) and proposing redactions to that transcript for public filing (ECF No. 142). Plaintiff Sarah Goolden consents to this request. The redactions include “certain sensitive, identifying information that is the subject of the letter motion submissions” previously placed under seal by Order of this Court (see ECF Nos. 129-131, 134). Accordingly, consistent with this Court’s prior Order (ECF No. 134) sealing documents containing similar information, the transcript filed at ECF No. 135 shall remain under seal. Defendant is directed to file the redacted version of the transcript on the public docket in this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 141. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York September 15, 2022 ______________________________ VALERIE FIGUEREDO United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?