Ahmed Ashour v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC et al

Filing 220

ORDER: The Court has reviewed ECF Nos. 217 and 218. The parties are directed to fully brief the issue of Defendants' request for a protective order. Defendants' opening brief is due January 24, 2023. Plaintiff' response is due Jan uary 31, 2023. The parties' papers shall not exceed 10 pages each. The parties shall also submit, by January 24, 2023, a joint chart outlining each objection that Defendants have to Plaintiffs' 30(b)(6) topics, and each response that Plaintiffs have to that objection. Every objection and every response must be supported by relevant case law. ( Brief due by 1/24/2023., Responses to Brief due by 1/31/2023) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 1/17/2023) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-07081-AT-OTW Document 220 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x AHMED ASHOUR, et al., : : Plaintiff, : : -against: : ARIZONA BEVERAGES USA LLC, et al., : : Defendants. : : --------------------------------------------------------------x 19-cv-7081 (AT) (OTW) ORDER ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court has reviewed ECF Nos. 217 and 218. The parties are directed to fully brief the issue of Defendants’ request for a protective order. Defendants’ opening brief is due January 24, 2023. Plaintiff’ response is due January 31, 2023. The parties’ papers shall not exceed 10 pages each. The parties shall also submit, by January 24, 2023, a joint chart outlining each objection that Defendants have to Plaintiffs’ 30(b)(6) topics, and each response that Plaintiffs have to that objection. Every objection and every response must be supported by relevant case law. Dated: January 17, 2023 New York, New York s/ Ona T. Wang Ona T. Wang United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?