Sanderson v. Leg Apparel LLC et al

Filing 144

ORDER: On June 3, 2021, the Court held a teleconference with the parties at which it discussed how this case should proceed in light of the recent service of Daytona Apparel Group LLC. As stated on the record, the Court sets the following schedule for the briefing of the Leg Defendants' anticipated motion for summary judgment. The Leg Defendants' motion is due on July 1, 2021; Mr. Sanderson's opposition is due no later than six weeks after service of the motion; any reply is due no later than two weeks following service of the opposition. As stated on the record, the parties are directed to submit hard courtesy copies in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. Rule 1A of the Court's Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19 is suspended to the extent it would forbid the submission of such copies. (Motions due by 7/1/2021.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/3/2021) (rro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- X : AFTERN SANDERSON, : : Plaintiff, : : -v : : LEG APPAREL LLC, AMIEE LYNN : ACCESSORIES, INC., STEVEN H. : SPOLANSKY, MELISSA ROMANINO, STUART : DIAMOND, and DAYTONA APPAREL GROUP : LLC, : : Defendants. : : ----------------------------------------------------------------- X GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 06/03/2021 1:19-cv-08423-GHW ORDER On June 3, 2021, the Court held a teleconference with the parties at which it discussed how this case should proceed in light of the recent service of Daytona Apparel Group LLC. As stated on the record, the Court sets the following schedule for the briefing of the Leg Defendants’ anticipated motion for summary judgment. The Leg Defendants’ motion is due on July 1, 2021; Mr. Sanderson’s opposition is due no later than six weeks after service of the motion; any reply is due no later than two weeks following service of the opposition. As stated on the record, the parties are directed to submit hard courtesy copies in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. Rule 1A of the Court’s Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19 is suspended to the extent it would forbid the submission of such copies. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 3, 2021 New York, New York __________________________________ GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?